The Gap, Inc. (GAP) vs Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. (NCLH)
GAP leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Gap, Inc. and Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GAP
The Gap, Inc.
$21.15Consumer Cyclical
NCLH
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
$20.44Consumer Cyclical
Total return — GAP vs NCLH
growth of $100 · last 13yGAP -35.8%NCLH -17.5%NCLH compounded faster
GAP NCLH
GAP vs NCLH: by the numbers
- •NCLH is the larger company ($9.38B vs $7.61B market cap).
- •GAP trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.33 vs 17.22 P/E).
- •GAP converts more revenue to profit (6.25% vs 5.66% net margin).
- •NCLH grew revenue faster over the past five years (208.16% vs -0.36% CAGR).
- •GAP pays a dividend (3.17% yield) while NCLH does not currently pay one.
Which is better, GAP or NCLH?
Metric tally: GAP 9 · NCLH 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGAP(lower P/E)
GrowthNCLH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityNCLH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GAP | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 8.33● | 17.22 |
| Forward P/E | 9.82● | 10.13 |
| P/S ratio | 0.52● | 0.95 |
| P/B ratio | 2.19● | 3.92 |
| PEG ratio | 0.55 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.22● | 10.29 |
| FCF yield | 15.97% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | GAP | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 40.50% | 43.05%● |
| Operating margin | 8.44% | 15.88%● |
| Net margin | 6.25%● | 5.66% |
| ROE | 26.32%● | 23.37% |
| ROIC | 8.06% | 8.75%● |
Dividends
| Metric | GAP | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.17% | — |
| Payout ratio | 30.73% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GAP | NCLH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.36% | 208.16%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.25%● | -22.47% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.60% | 35.22%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -3.97%● | -7.57% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GAP or NCLH?
- It depends on your goal. value: GAP (lower P/E); growth: NCLH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NCLH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GAP leads 9 to 5.
- Is GAP or NCLH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GAP is cheaper: GAP trades at a 8.33 P/E and NCLH at 17.22.
- Which has grown faster, GAP or NCLH?
- Over the past five years, NCLH grew revenue faster — GAP at a -0.36% CAGR versus NCLH at 208.16%.
- Does GAP or NCLH pay a bigger dividend?
- GAP pays a dividend (3.17% yield) while NCLH does not currently pay one.
- Is GAP or NCLH more profitable?
- GAP runs the higher net margin — GAP at 6.25% versus NCLH at 5.66%.
- Which has been the better investment, GAP or NCLH?
- Over the past 10-year, GAP delivered the higher annualized total return — GAP at 4.06% versus NCLH at -7.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Gap P/E ratioNorwegian Cruise Line P/E ratioGap dividend yieldNorwegian Cruise Line dividend yieldGap ROENorwegian Cruise Line ROEGap operating marginNorwegian Cruise Line operating marginGap revenue growthNorwegian Cruise Line revenue growthGap free cash flowNorwegian Cruise Line free cash flow
Gap & Norwegian Cruise Line appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.