Which has the lower trailing P/E, GAP or MUSA?

GAP has the lower trailing P/E: GAP trades at 6.62 and MUSA at 15.85. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, GAP or MUSA?

Over the past five years, MUSA grew revenue faster — GAP at a 2.17% CAGR versus MUSA at 9.42%.

Does GAP or MUSA pay a bigger dividend?

GAP yields 3.08% and MUSA yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GAP or MUSA more profitable?

GAP runs the higher net margin — GAP at 8.14% versus MUSA at 2.87%.

How have GAP and MUSA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, GAP delivered 2.70% and MUSA delivered 21.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Gap, Inc. (GAP) vs Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA)

A side-by-side comparison of The Gap, Inc. and Murphy USA Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

GAP

The Gap, Inc.

$8.03B

$22.32Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MUSA

Murphy USA Inc.

$9.65B

$522.30Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — GAP vs MUSA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

GAP +23.2% (+2.1%/yr)MUSA +621.9% (+21.9%/yr)MUSA compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GAP MUSA

GAP vs MUSA: by the numbers

•MUSA is the larger company ($9.65B vs $8.03B market cap).
•GAP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (6.62 vs 15.85 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GAP converts more revenue to profit (8.14% vs 2.87% net margin).
•MUSA grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.42% vs 2.17% CAGR).
•GAP pays the higher dividend yield (3.08% vs 0.59%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GAP	MUSA
P/E ratio	6.62	15.85
Forward P/E	10.25	14.91
P/S ratio	0.53	0.45
P/B ratio	2.07	12.34
EV / EBITDA	5.37	9.92
FCF yield	13.57%	5.61%

Profitability

Metric	GAP	MUSA
Gross margin	43.26%	7.26%
Operating margin	10.99%	4.38%
Net margin	8.14%	2.87%
ROE	31.56%	78.86%
ROIC	12.03%	17.90%

Dividends

Metric	GAP	MUSA
Dividend yield	3.08%	0.59%
Payout ratio	31.19%	12.63%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GAP	MUSA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.17%	9.42%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.25%	12.97%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.85%	16.64%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	0.86%	27.86%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, GAP or MUSA?: GAP has the lower trailing P/E: GAP trades at 6.62 and MUSA at 15.85. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, GAP or MUSA?: Over the past five years, MUSA grew revenue faster — GAP at a 2.17% CAGR versus MUSA at 9.42%.
Does GAP or MUSA pay a bigger dividend?: GAP yields 3.08% and MUSA yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GAP or MUSA more profitable?: GAP runs the higher net margin — GAP at 8.14% versus MUSA at 2.87%.
How have GAP and MUSA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, GAP delivered 2.70% and MUSA delivered 21.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GAP analysis Full MUSA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Gap P/E ratio Murphy USA P/E ratio Gap dividend yield Murphy USA dividend yield Gap ROE Murphy USA ROE Gap operating margin Murphy USA operating margin Gap revenue growth Murphy USA revenue growth Gap free cash flow Murphy USA free cash flow

Gap & Murphy USA appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.