Is G or PATH cheaper?

On trailing earnings, G is cheaper: G trades at a 9.83 P/E and PATH at 17.50.

Which has grown faster, G or PATH?

Over the past five years, PATH grew revenue faster — G at a 6.70% CAGR versus PATH at 19.70%.

Does G or PATH pay a bigger dividend?

G pays a dividend (2.76% yield) while PATH does not currently pay one.

Is G or PATH more profitable?

PATH runs the higher net margin — G at 11.04% versus PATH at 19.58%.

Which has been the better investment, G or PATH?

Over the past 5-year, G delivered the higher annualized total return — G at 2.55% versus PATH at -31.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Genpact Limited (G) vs UiPath Inc. (PATH)

G leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Genpact Limited and UiPath Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — G vs PATH

growth of $100 · last 5y

G -28.4%PATH -84.7%G compounded faster

G PATH

G vs PATH: by the numbers

•PATH is the larger company ($5.61B vs $5.43B market cap).
•G trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.83 vs 17.50 P/E).
•PATH converts more revenue to profit (19.58% vs 11.04% net margin).
•PATH grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.70% vs 6.70% CAGR).
•G pays a dividend (2.76% yield) while PATH does not currently pay one.

Which is better, G or PATH?

Metric tally: G 10 · PATH 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueG(lower P/E)

GrowthPATH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityG(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	G	PATH
P/E ratio	9.83●	17.50
Forward P/E	7.87●	15.66
P/S ratio	1.07●	3.33
P/B ratio	2.24●	2.93
PEG ratio	1.41	—
EV / EBITDA	7.93●	31.33
FCF yield	11.89%●	6.74%

Profitability

Metric	G	PATH
Gross margin	36.43%	82.96%●
Operating margin	15.08%●	6.19%
Net margin	11.04%	19.58%●
ROE	23.01%●	17.21%
ROIC	12.29%●	2.68%

Dividends

Metric	G	PATH
Dividend yield	2.76%	—
Payout ratio	27.83%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	G	PATH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.70%	19.70%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.44%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	1.55%	65.27%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-5.57%●	-31.79%

Frequently asked

Which is better, G or PATH?: It depends on your goal. value: G (lower P/E); growth: PATH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: G (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, G leads 10 to 4.
Is G or PATH cheaper?: On trailing earnings, G is cheaper: G trades at a 9.83 P/E and PATH at 17.50.
Which has grown faster, G or PATH?: Over the past five years, PATH grew revenue faster — G at a 6.70% CAGR versus PATH at 19.70%.
Does G or PATH pay a bigger dividend?: G pays a dividend (2.76% yield) while PATH does not currently pay one.
Is G or PATH more profitable?: PATH runs the higher net margin — G at 11.04% versus PATH at 19.58%.
Which has been the better investment, G or PATH?: Over the past 5-year, G delivered the higher annualized total return — G at 2.55% versus PATH at -31.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full G analysis Full PATH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Genpact P/E ratio UiPath P/E ratio Genpact dividend yield UiPath dividend yield Genpact ROE UiPath ROE Genpact operating margin UiPath operating margin Genpact revenue growth UiPath revenue growth Genpact free cash flow UiPath free cash flow

Genpact & UiPath appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.