Which has the lower trailing P/E, G or NA?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: G trades at 9.87 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, G or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — G at a 6.70% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Does G or NA pay a bigger dividend?

G pays a dividend (2.22% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is G or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — G at 11.04% versus NA at 505.49%.

Genpact Limited (G) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of Genpact Limited and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Genpact Limited

$5.87B

$34.61TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — G vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

G -26.7%NA -98.4%G compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

G NA

G vs NA: by the numbers

•G is the larger company ($5.87B vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 9.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 11.04% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 6.70% CAGR).
•G pays a dividend (2.22% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	G	NA
P/E ratio	9.87	2.30
Forward P/E	7.90	N/A
P/S ratio	1.08	11.40
P/B ratio	2.25	0.41
PEG ratio	1.41	N/A
EV / EBITDA	7.74	6.44
FCF yield	11.85%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	G	NA
Gross margin	36.43%	-147.33%
Operating margin	15.08%	-396.84%
Net margin	11.04%	505.49%
ROE	23.01%	17.96%
ROIC	12.29%	-10.96%

Dividends

Metric	G	NA
Dividend yield	2.22%	N/A
Payout ratio	22.48%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	G	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.70%	64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.44%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	1.55%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-5.36%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, G or NA?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: G trades at 9.87 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, G or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — G at a 6.70% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Does G or NA pay a bigger dividend?: G pays a dividend (2.22% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is G or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — G at 11.04% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full G analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Genpact P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio Genpact dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield Genpact ROE Nano Labs ROE Genpact operating margin Nano Labs operating margin Genpact revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth Genpact free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

Genpact & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.