Which has the lower trailing P/E, FTV or ONTO?

FTV has the lower trailing P/E: FTV trades at 33.81 and ONTO at 123.22. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FTV or ONTO?

Over the past five years, ONTO grew revenue faster — FTV at a 2.10% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.67%.

Does FTV or ONTO pay a bigger dividend?

FTV pays a dividend (0.44% yield), while ONTO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is FTV or ONTO more profitable?

FTV runs the higher net margin — FTV at 12.38% versus ONTO at 11.84%.

How have FTV and ONTO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FTV delivered 6.43% and ONTO delivered 30.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fortive Corporation (FTV) vs Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)

A side-by-side comparison of Fortive Corporation and Onto Innovation Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FTV

Fortive Corporation

$17.36B

$57.47TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT

ONTO

Onto Innovation Inc.

$16.30B

$327.77TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FTV vs ONTO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FTV +84.8% (+6.3%/yr)ONTO +1369.2% (+30.8%/yr)ONTO compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FTV ONTO

FTV vs ONTO: by the numbers

•FTV is the larger company ($17.36B vs $16.30B market cap).
•FTV trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.81 vs 123.22 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FTV converts more revenue to profit (12.38% vs 11.84% net margin).
•ONTO grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.67% vs 2.10% CAGR).
•FTV pays a dividend (0.44% yield), while ONTO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FTV	ONTO
P/E ratio	33.81	123.22
Forward P/E	19.07	40.39
P/S ratio	4.02	14.56
P/B ratio	2.86	8.48
EV / EBITDA	17.39	67.05
FCF yield	5.50%	1.55%

Profitability

Metric	FTV	ONTO
Gross margin	63.23%	50.36%
Operating margin	18.23%	12.48%
Net margin	12.38%	11.84%
ROE	8.82%	6.90%
ROIC	6.83%	3.42%

Dividends

Metric	FTV	ONTO
Dividend yield	0.44%	N/A
Payout ratio	14.71%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FTV	ONTO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.10%	11.67%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-17.51%	-0.96%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-6.39%	15.11%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.87%	35.00%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FTV or ONTO?: FTV has the lower trailing P/E: FTV trades at 33.81 and ONTO at 123.22. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FTV or ONTO?: Over the past five years, ONTO grew revenue faster — FTV at a 2.10% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.67%.
Does FTV or ONTO pay a bigger dividend?: FTV pays a dividend (0.44% yield), while ONTO has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is FTV or ONTO more profitable?: FTV runs the higher net margin — FTV at 12.38% versus ONTO at 11.84%.
How have FTV and ONTO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FTV delivered 6.43% and ONTO delivered 30.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FTV analysis Full ONTO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fortive P/E ratio Onto Innovation P/E ratio Fortive dividend yield Fortive ROE Onto Innovation ROE Fortive operating margin Onto Innovation operating margin Fortive revenue growth Onto Innovation revenue growth Fortive free cash flow Onto Innovation free cash flow

Fortive & Onto Innovation appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 4, 2026.