Which has the lower trailing P/E, FTV or LSCC?

FTV has the lower trailing P/E: FTV trades at 33.81 and LSCC at 526.94. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FTV or LSCC?

Over the past five years, LSCC grew revenue faster — FTV at a 2.10% CAGR versus LSCC at 7.58%.

Does FTV or LSCC pay a bigger dividend?

FTV pays a dividend (0.45% yield), while LSCC has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is FTV or LSCC more profitable?

FTV runs the higher net margin — FTV at 12.38% versus LSCC at 5.58%.

How have FTV and LSCC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FTV delivered 6.13% and LSCC delivered 34.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fortive Corporation (FTV) vs Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC)

A side-by-side comparison of Fortive Corporation and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FTV

Fortive Corporation

$17.36B

$57.47TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT

LSCC

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation

$18.36B

$134.00TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FTV vs LSCC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FTV +79.6% (+6.0%/yr)LSCC +1888.6% (+34.9%/yr)LSCC compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FTV LSCC

FTV vs LSCC: by the numbers

•LSCC is the larger company ($18.36B vs $17.36B market cap).
•FTV trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.81 vs 526.94 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FTV converts more revenue to profit (12.38% vs 5.58% net margin).
•LSCC grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.58% vs 2.10% CAGR).
•FTV pays a dividend (0.45% yield), while LSCC has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FTV	LSCC
P/E ratio	33.81	526.94
Forward P/E	19.07	N/A
P/S ratio	4.02	28.20
P/B ratio	2.86	23.31
EV / EBITDA	17.39	199.23
FCF yield	5.50%	1.15%

Profitability

Metric	FTV	LSCC
Gross margin	63.23%	67.66%
Operating margin	18.23%	7.63%
Net margin	12.38%	5.58%
ROE	8.82%	4.61%
ROIC	6.83%	4.85%

Dividends

Metric	FTV	LSCC
Dividend yield	0.45%	N/A
Payout ratio	14.71%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FTV	LSCC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.10%	7.58%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-17.51%	-42.23%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-6.39%	-4.27%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.28%	14.41%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FTV or LSCC?: FTV has the lower trailing P/E: FTV trades at 33.81 and LSCC at 526.94. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FTV or LSCC?: Over the past five years, LSCC grew revenue faster — FTV at a 2.10% CAGR versus LSCC at 7.58%.
Does FTV or LSCC pay a bigger dividend?: FTV pays a dividend (0.45% yield), while LSCC has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is FTV or LSCC more profitable?: FTV runs the higher net margin — FTV at 12.38% versus LSCC at 5.58%.
How have FTV and LSCC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FTV delivered 6.13% and LSCC delivered 34.82% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FTV analysis Full LSCC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fortive P/E ratio Lattice Semiconductor P/E ratio Fortive dividend yield Fortive ROE Lattice Semiconductor ROE Fortive operating margin Lattice Semiconductor operating margin Fortive revenue growth Lattice Semiconductor revenue growth Fortive free cash flow Lattice Semiconductor free cash flow

Fortive & Lattice Semiconductor appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.