Which has the lower trailing P/E, FTDR or RUSHA?

RUSHA has the lower trailing P/E: FTDR trades at 20.74 and RUSHA at 14.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FTDR or RUSHA?

Over the past five years, RUSHA grew revenue faster — FTDR at a 6.68% CAGR versus RUSHA at 7.70%.

Does FTDR or RUSHA pay a bigger dividend?

RUSHA pays a dividend (1.10% yield), while FTDR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is FTDR or RUSHA more profitable?

FTDR runs the higher net margin — FTDR at 12.76% versus RUSHA at 3.67%.

How have FTDR and RUSHA total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, FTDR delivered 13.26% and RUSHA delivered 19.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Frontdoor, Inc. (FTDR) vs Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA)

A side-by-side comparison of Frontdoor, Inc. and Rush Enterprises, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FTDR

Frontdoor, Inc.

$5.50B

$78.37Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:00 PM EDT

RUSHA

Rush Enterprises, Inc.

$5.49B

$47.11Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:55 PM EDT

Total return — FTDR vs RUSHA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

FTDR +158.7% (+12.6%/yr)RUSHA +339.0% (+20.3%/yr)RUSHA compounded faster over this window

FTDR RUSHA

FTDR vs RUSHA: by the numbers

•FTDR is the larger company ($5.50B vs $5.49B market cap).
•RUSHA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.19 vs 20.74 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FTDR converts more revenue to profit (12.76% vs 3.67% net margin).
•RUSHA grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.70% vs 6.68% CAGR).
•RUSHA pays a dividend (1.10% yield), while FTDR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FTDR	RUSHA
P/E ratio	20.74	14.19
Forward P/E	16.63	19.11
PEG ratio	0.98	1.37
P/S ratio	2.56	0.76
P/B ratio	19.38	2.36
EV / EBITDA	11.55	12.49
FCF yield	7.01%	2.28%

Profitability

Metric	FTDR	RUSHA
Gross margin	52.54%	18.98%
Operating margin	19.98%	5.13%
Net margin	12.76%	3.67%
ROE	96.48%	11.38%
ROIC	18.24%	7.17%

Dividends

Metric	FTDR	RUSHA
Dividend yield	N/A	1.10%
Payout ratio	N/A	15.66%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FTDR	RUSHA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.68%	7.70%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	21.58%	19.21%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	20.65%	-22.34%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.26%	19.56%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FTDR or RUSHA?: RUSHA has the lower trailing P/E: FTDR trades at 20.74 and RUSHA at 14.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FTDR or RUSHA?: Over the past five years, RUSHA grew revenue faster — FTDR at a 6.68% CAGR versus RUSHA at 7.70%.
Does FTDR or RUSHA pay a bigger dividend?: RUSHA pays a dividend (1.10% yield), while FTDR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is FTDR or RUSHA more profitable?: FTDR runs the higher net margin — FTDR at 12.76% versus RUSHA at 3.67%.
How have FTDR and RUSHA total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, FTDR delivered 13.26% and RUSHA delivered 19.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FTDR analysis Full RUSHA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Frontdoor P/E ratio Rush Enterprises P/E ratio Rush Enterprises dividend yield Frontdoor ROE Rush Enterprises ROE Frontdoor operating margin Rush Enterprises operating margin Frontdoor revenue growth Rush Enterprises revenue growth Frontdoor free cash flow Rush Enterprises free cash flow

Frontdoor & Rush Enterprises appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.