Which has grown faster, FT or NMS?

Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 0.42% CAGR versus NMS at -8.12%.

Does FT or NMS pay a bigger dividend?

FT yields 6.77% and NMS yields 7.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FT or NMS more profitable?

NMS runs the higher net margin — FT at 100.92% versus NMS at 130.68%.

How have FT and NMS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FT delivered 7.70% and NMS delivered 0.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)

A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Franklin Universal Trust

$178M

$7.09Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

NMS

Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund

$64M

$9.94Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — FT vs NMS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FT +106.6% (+7.5%/yr)NMS +2.4% (+0.2%/yr)FT compounded faster over this window

FT NMS

FT vs NMS: by the numbers

•FT is the larger company ($178M vs $64M market cap).
•NMS converts more revenue to profit (130.68% vs 100.92% net margin).
•FT grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.42% vs -8.12% CAGR).
•NMS pays the higher dividend yield (7.49% vs 6.77%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FT	NMS
P/B ratio	0.78	0.84

Profitability

Metric	FT	NMS
Gross margin	87.35%	85.04%
Operating margin	119.92%	162.66%
Net margin	100.92%	130.68%
ROE	9.04%	9.39%

Dividends

Metric	FT	NMS
Dividend yield	6.77%	7.49%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FT	NMS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.42%	-8.12%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-3.96%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	4.66%	-2.81%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, FT or NMS?: Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 0.42% CAGR versus NMS at -8.12%.
Does FT or NMS pay a bigger dividend?: FT yields 6.77% and NMS yields 7.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FT or NMS more profitable?: NMS runs the higher net margin — FT at 100.92% versus NMS at 130.68%.
How have FT and NMS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FT delivered 7.70% and NMS delivered 0.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FT analysis Full NMS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Franklin Universal dividend yield Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yield Franklin Universal ROE Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROE Franklin Universal operating margin Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating margin Franklin Universal revenue growth Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growth

Franklin Universal & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.