Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
FT
Franklin Universal Trust
$7.89Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 13, 2026, 11:14 AM EDT
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
$11.60Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 13, 2026, 10:53 AM EDT
Total return — FT vs NMS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yFT +116.1% (+8.0%/yr)NMS +9.4% (+0.9%/yr)FT compounded faster over this window
FT NMS
FT vs NMS: by the numbers
- •FT is the larger company ($198M vs $74M market cap).
- •FT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.93 vs 10.79 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NMS converts more revenue to profit (130.68% vs 100.92% net margin).
- •NMS grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.23% vs 0.42% CAGR).
- •NMS pays the higher dividend yield (6.91% vs 6.49%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 2.93 | 10.79 |
| P/S ratio | 5.29 | 9.54 |
| P/B ratio | 0.87 | 0.88 |
Profitability
| Metric | FT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 87.35% | 85.04% |
| Operating margin | 119.92% | 162.66% |
| Net margin | 100.92% | 130.68% |
| ROE | 9.04% | -0.33% |
| ROIC | 8.38% | 7.04% |
Dividends
| Metric | FT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.49% | 6.91% |
| Payout ratio | 67.11% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.42% | 9.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -22.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.80% | -0.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, FT or NMS?
- FT has the lower trailing P/E: FT trades at 2.93 and NMS at 10.79. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, FT or NMS?
- Over the past five years, NMS grew revenue faster — FT at a 0.42% CAGR versus NMS at 9.23%.
- Does FT or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
- FT yields 6.49% and NMS yields 6.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FT or NMS more profitable?
- NMS runs the higher net margin — FT at 100.92% versus NMS at 130.68%.
- How have FT and NMS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, FT delivered 7.93% and NMS delivered 0.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Franklin Universal P/E ratioNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioFranklin Universal dividend yieldNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldFranklin Universal ROENuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEFranklin Universal operating marginNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginFranklin Universal revenue growthNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growth
Franklin Universal & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 13, 2026.