Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS)
FT leads on 11 of 11 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FT
Franklin Universal Trust
$8.05Financial Services
NMS
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund
$12.00Financial Services
Total return — FT vs NMS
growth of $100 · last 12yFT +13.7%NMS -20.0%FT compounded faster
FT NMS
FT vs NMS: by the numbers
- •FT is the larger company ($202M vs $75M market cap).
- •FT trades at the lower earnings multiple (3.00 vs 11.21 P/E).
- •FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 87.52% net margin).
- •FT grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.92% vs -7.24% CAGR).
- •FT pays the higher dividend yield (6.34% vs 6.30%).
Which is better, FT or NMS?
Metric tally: FT 11 · NMS 0It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFT(lower P/E)
GrowthFT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityFT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 3.00● | 11.21 |
| P/S ratio | 5.42● | 9.91 |
| P/B ratio | 0.89● | 1.00 |
| PEG ratio | — | 2.28 |
Profitability
| Metric | FT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 86.88%● | -4.36% |
| Operating margin | 119.92%● | -12.54% |
| Net margin | 179.50%● | 87.52% |
| ROE | 29.45%● | 8.85% |
| ROIC | 8.38%● | -0.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | FT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.34% | 6.30% |
| Payout ratio | 67.11% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FT | NMS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.92%● | -7.24% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.82%● | -22.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.97%● | -0.65% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FT or NMS?
- It depends on your goal. value: FT (lower P/E); growth: FT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FT leads 11 to 0.
- Is FT or NMS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FT is cheaper: FT trades at a 3.00 P/E and NMS at 11.21.
- Which has grown faster, FT or NMS?
- Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus NMS at -7.24%.
- Does FT or NMS pay a bigger dividend?
- FT yields 6.34% and NMS yields 6.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FT or NMS more profitable?
- FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus NMS at 87.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, FT or NMS?
- Over the past 10-year, FT delivered the higher annualized total return — FT at 8.43% versus NMS at 1.71%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Franklin Universal P/E ratioNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioFranklin Universal dividend yieldNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldFranklin Universal ROENuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEFranklin Universal operating marginNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginFranklin Universal revenue growthNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growthFranklin Universal free cash flowNuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund free cash flow
Franklin Universal & Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.