Which has the lower trailing P/E, FT or NAD?

FT has the lower trailing P/E: FT trades at 2.92 and NAD at 11.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FT or NAD?

Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus NAD at 0.03%.

Does FT or NAD pay a bigger dividend?

FT yields 6.51% and NAD yields 7.19% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FT or NAD more profitable?

FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus NAD at 56.66%.

How have FT and NAD total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FT delivered 7.97% and NAD delivered 2.49% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD)

A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Franklin Universal Trust

$197M

$7.85Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 11, 2026, 12:04 PM EDT

NAD

Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund

$2.75B

$11.79Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 11, 2026, 12:09 PM EDT

Total return — FT vs NAD

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FT +113.7% (+7.9%/yr)NAD +28.2% (+2.5%/yr)FT compounded faster over this window

FT NAD

FT vs NAD: by the numbers

•NAD is the larger company ($2.75B vs $197M market cap).
•FT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.92 vs 11.38 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 56.66% net margin).
•FT grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.92% vs 0.03% CAGR).
•NAD pays the higher dividend yield (7.19% vs 6.51%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FT	NAD
P/E ratio	2.92	11.38
P/S ratio	5.27	6.50
P/B ratio	0.86	0.99

Profitability

Metric	FT	NAD
Gross margin	86.88%	86.73%
Operating margin	119.92%	69.73%
Net margin	179.50%	56.66%
ROE	29.45%	8.64%
ROIC	8.38%	2.93%

Dividends

Metric	FT	NAD
Dividend yield	6.51%	7.19%
Payout ratio	67.11%	303.93%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FT	NAD
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.92%	0.03%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-10.59%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.87%	-0.44%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FT or NAD?: FT has the lower trailing P/E: FT trades at 2.92 and NAD at 11.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FT or NAD?: Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus NAD at 0.03%.
Does FT or NAD pay a bigger dividend?: FT yields 6.51% and NAD yields 7.19% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FT or NAD more profitable?: FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus NAD at 56.66%.
How have FT and NAD total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FT delivered 7.97% and NAD delivered 2.49% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FT analysis Full NAD analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Franklin Universal P/E ratio Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratio Franklin Universal dividend yield Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yield Franklin Universal ROE Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund ROE Franklin Universal operating margin Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund operating margin Franklin Universal revenue growth Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growth

Franklin Universal & Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 11, 2026.