Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund (NAD)
FT leads on 10 of 12 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FT
Franklin Universal Trust
$8.04Financial Services
NAD
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
$12.04Financial Services
Total return — FT vs NAD
growth of $100 · last 27yFT -11.2%NAD -19.7%FT compounded faster
FT NAD
FT vs NAD: by the numbers
- •NAD is the larger company ($2.81B vs $202M market cap).
- •FT trades at the lower earnings multiple (3.00 vs 4.87 P/E).
- •FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 140.28% net margin).
- •FT grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.92% vs -0.50% CAGR).
- •NAD pays the higher dividend yield (7.03% vs 6.34%).
Which is better, FT or NAD?
Metric tally: FT 10 · NAD 2It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFT(lower P/E)
GrowthFT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeNAD(higher dividend yield)
QualityFT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FT | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 3.00● | 4.87 |
| P/S ratio | 5.41● | 6.85 |
| P/B ratio | 0.89● | 0.98 |
Profitability
| Metric | FT | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 86.88% | 93.93%● |
| Operating margin | 119.92%● | 69.73% |
| Net margin | 179.50%● | 140.28% |
| ROE | 29.45%● | 20.16% |
| ROIC | 8.38%● | 2.93% |
Dividends
| Metric | FT | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.34% | 7.03%● |
| Payout ratio | 67.11% | 302.14% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FT | NAD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.92%● | -0.50% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.82%● | -10.59% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.95%● | 0.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FT or NAD?
- It depends on your goal. value: FT (lower P/E); growth: FT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: NAD (higher dividend yield); quality: FT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FT leads 10 to 2.
- Is FT or NAD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FT is cheaper: FT trades at a 3.00 P/E and NAD at 4.87.
- Which has grown faster, FT or NAD?
- Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus NAD at -0.50%.
- Does FT or NAD pay a bigger dividend?
- FT yields 6.34% and NAD yields 7.03% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FT or NAD more profitable?
- FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus NAD at 140.28%.
- Which has been the better investment, FT or NAD?
- Over the past 10-year, FT delivered the higher annualized total return — FT at 8.42% versus NAD at 2.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Franklin Universal P/E ratioNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund P/E ratioFranklin Universal dividend yieldNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund dividend yieldFranklin Universal ROENuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund ROEFranklin Universal operating marginNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund operating marginFranklin Universal revenue growthNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund revenue growthFranklin Universal free cash flowNuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund free cash flow
Franklin Universal & Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.