Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)
A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: FT is classified in Financial Services; NA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
FT
Franklin Universal Trust
$7.99Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NA
Nano Labs Ltd
$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — FT vs NA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4yFT +44.4%NA -98.4%FT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FT NA
FT vs NA: by the numbers
- •FT is the larger company ($201M vs $119M market cap).
- •NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 2.98 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 179.50% net margin).
- •NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 3.92% CAGR).
- •FT pays a dividend (6.39% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FT | NA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 2.98 | 2.30 |
| P/S ratio | 5.37 | 11.40 |
| P/B ratio | 0.88 | 0.41 |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 6.44 |
Profitability
| Metric | FT | NA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 86.88% | -147.33% |
| Operating margin | 119.92% | -396.84% |
| Net margin | 179.50% | 505.49% |
| ROE | 29.45% | 17.96% |
| ROIC | 8.38% | -10.96% |
Dividends
| Metric | FT | NA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.39% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 67.11% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FT | NA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.92% | 64.16% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.46% | N/A |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, FT or NA?
- NA has the lower trailing P/E: FT trades at 2.98 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, FT or NA?
- Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
- Does FT or NA pay a bigger dividend?
- FT pays a dividend (6.39% yield), while NA has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is FT or NA more profitable?
- NA runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus NA at 505.49%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Franklin Universal P/E ratioNano Labs P/E ratioFranklin Universal dividend yieldNano Labs dividend yieldFranklin Universal ROENano Labs ROEFranklin Universal operating marginNano Labs operating marginFranklin Universal revenue growthNano Labs revenue growthFranklin Universal free cash flowNano Labs free cash flow
Franklin Universal & Nano Labs appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.