Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Lyft, Inc. (LYFT)
A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Lyft, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: FT is classified in Financial Services; LYFT is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
FT
Franklin Universal Trust
$7.99Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
LYFT
Lyft, Inc.
$15.45TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — FT vs LYFT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yFT +85.5%LYFT -80.5%FT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FT LYFT
FT vs LYFT: by the numbers
- •LYFT is the larger company ($5.87B vs $201M market cap).
- •LYFT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.20 vs 2.98 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 43.82% net margin).
- •LYFT grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.43% vs 3.92% CAGR).
- •FT pays a dividend (6.39% yield), while LYFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FT | LYFT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 2.98 | 2.20 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 25.64 |
| P/S ratio | 5.37 | 0.93 |
| P/B ratio | 0.88 | 2.01 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 19.01% |
Profitability
| Metric | FT | LYFT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 86.88% | 43.24% |
| Operating margin | 119.92% | -2.53% |
| Net margin | 179.50% | 43.82% |
| ROE | 29.45% | 94.37% |
| ROIC | 8.38% | 217.84% |
Dividends
| Metric | FT | LYFT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.39% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 67.11% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FT | LYFT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.92% | 26.43% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.46% | -22.81% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, FT or LYFT?
- LYFT has the lower trailing P/E: FT trades at 2.98 and LYFT at 2.20. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, FT or LYFT?
- Over the past five years, LYFT grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus LYFT at 26.43%.
- Does FT or LYFT pay a bigger dividend?
- FT pays a dividend (6.39% yield), while LYFT has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is FT or LYFT more profitable?
- FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus LYFT at 43.82%.
- How have FT and LYFT total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, FT delivered 8.00% and LYFT delivered -22.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Franklin Universal P/E ratioLyft P/E ratioFranklin Universal dividend yieldLyft dividend yieldFranklin Universal ROELyft ROEFranklin Universal operating marginLyft operating marginFranklin Universal revenue growthLyft revenue growthFranklin Universal free cash flowLyft free cash flow
Franklin Universal & Lyft appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.