Which has the lower trailing P/E, FT or HYPOF?

FT has the lower trailing P/E: FT trades at 2.94 and HYPOF at 19.15. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FT or HYPOF?

Over the past five years, HYPOF grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus HYPOF at 9.11%.

Does FT or HYPOF pay a bigger dividend?

FT pays a dividend (6.46% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is FT or HYPOF more profitable?

FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus HYPOF at 4.60%.

How have FT and HYPOF total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, FT delivered 8.07% and HYPOF delivered -29.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs Hypoport SE (HYPOF)

A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and Hypoport SE across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Franklin Universal Trust

$197M

$7.85Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 6, 2026, 1:55 PM EDT

HYPOF

Hypoport SE

$631M

$94.77Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FT vs HYPOF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

FT +79.1%HYPOF -64.1%FT compounded faster

FT HYPOF

FT vs HYPOF: by the numbers

•HYPOF is the larger company ($631M vs $197M market cap).
•FT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.94 vs 19.15 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 4.60% net margin).
•HYPOF grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.11% vs 3.92% CAGR).
•FT pays a dividend (6.46% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FT	HYPOF
P/E ratio	2.94	19.15
Forward P/E	N/A	21.01
P/S ratio	5.31	0.88
P/B ratio	0.87	1.44
PEG ratio	N/A	0.43

Profitability

Metric	FT	HYPOF
Gross margin	86.88%	15.50%
Operating margin	119.92%	4.60%
Net margin	179.50%	4.60%
ROE	29.45%	7.51%
ROIC	8.38%	3.79%

Dividends

Metric	FT	HYPOF
Dividend yield	6.46%	N/A
Payout ratio	67.11%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FT	HYPOF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.92%	9.11%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-2.99%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.03%	-29.44%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FT or HYPOF?: FT has the lower trailing P/E: FT trades at 2.94 and HYPOF at 19.15. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FT or HYPOF?: Over the past five years, HYPOF grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus HYPOF at 9.11%.
Does FT or HYPOF pay a bigger dividend?: FT pays a dividend (6.46% yield), while HYPOF has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is FT or HYPOF more profitable?: FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus HYPOF at 4.60%.
How have FT and HYPOF total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, FT delivered 8.07% and HYPOF delivered -29.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FT analysis Full HYPOF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Franklin Universal P/E ratio Hypoport SE P/E ratio Franklin Universal dividend yield Hypoport SE dividend yield Franklin Universal ROE Hypoport SE ROE Franklin Universal operating margin Hypoport SE operating margin Franklin Universal revenue growth Hypoport SE revenue growth Franklin Universal free cash flow Hypoport SE free cash flow

Franklin Universal & Hypoport SE appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 6, 2026.