Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs The New Germany Fund, Inc. (GF)
FT leads on 10 of 12 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and The New Germany Fund, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FT
Franklin Universal Trust
$8.04Financial Services
GF
The New Germany Fund, Inc.
$11.65Financial Services
Total return — FT vs GF
growth of $100 · last 30yFT -10.7%GF -6.8%GF compounded faster
FT GF
FT vs GF: by the numbers
- •FT is the larger company ($202M vs $189M market cap).
- •FT trades at the lower earnings multiple (3.00 vs 5.32 P/E).
- •GF converts more revenue to profit (286.83% vs 179.50% net margin).
- •FT grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.92% vs -3.04% CAGR).
- •FT pays the higher dividend yield (6.34% vs 2.44%).
Which is better, FT or GF?
Metric tally: FT 10 · GF 2It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFT(lower P/E)
GrowthFT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeFT(higher dividend yield)
QualityGF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FT | GF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 3.00● | 5.32 |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.14 |
| P/S ratio | 5.41● | 15.30 |
| P/B ratio | 0.89● | 0.92 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.02 |
Profitability
| Metric | FT | GF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 86.88%● | 85.03% |
| Operating margin | 198.87%● | -98.27% |
| Net margin | 179.50% | 286.83%● |
| ROE | 29.45%● | 17.19% |
| ROIC | 8.38% | 26.89%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FT | GF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 6.34%● | 2.44% |
| Payout ratio | 67.11% | 8.27% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FT | GF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.92%● | -3.04% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.82%● | -11.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.94%● | -8.37% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FT or GF?
- It depends on your goal. value: FT (lower P/E); growth: FT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FT (higher dividend yield); quality: GF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FT leads 10 to 2.
- Is FT or GF cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FT is cheaper: FT trades at a 3.00 P/E and GF at 5.32.
- Which has grown faster, FT or GF?
- Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus GF at -3.04%.
- Does FT or GF pay a bigger dividend?
- FT yields 6.34% and GF yields 2.44% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FT or GF more profitable?
- GF runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus GF at 286.83%.
- Which has been the better investment, FT or GF?
- Over the past 10-year, FT delivered the higher annualized total return — FT at 8.42% versus GF at 6.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Franklin Universal P/E ratioNew Germany Fund P/E ratioFranklin Universal dividend yieldNew Germany Fund dividend yieldFranklin Universal ROENew Germany Fund ROEFranklin Universal operating marginNew Germany Fund operating marginFranklin Universal revenue growthNew Germany Fund revenue growthFranklin Universal free cash flowNew Germany Fund free cash flow
Franklin Universal & New Germany Fund appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.