Which has the lower trailing P/E, FT or GF?

FT has the lower trailing P/E: FT trades at 2.92 and GF at 5.28. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FT or GF?

Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus GF at -3.04%.

Does FT or GF pay a bigger dividend?

FT yields 6.51% and GF yields 2.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FT or GF more profitable?

GF runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus GF at 286.83%.

How have FT and GF total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FT delivered 7.98% and GF delivered 5.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs The New Germany Fund, Inc. (GF)

A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and The New Germany Fund, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Franklin Universal Trust

$197M

$7.83Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

The New Germany Fund, Inc.

$187M

$11.56Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Aug 7, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FT vs GF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FT +113.7% (+7.9%/yr)GF +62.3% (+5.0%/yr)FT compounded faster over this window

FT GF

FT vs GF: by the numbers

•FT is the larger company ($197M vs $187M market cap).
•FT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.92 vs 5.28 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•GF converts more revenue to profit (286.83% vs 179.50% net margin).
•FT grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.92% vs -3.04% CAGR).
•FT pays the higher dividend yield (6.51% vs 2.46%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FT	GF
P/E ratio	2.92	5.28
Forward P/E	N/A	5.10
P/S ratio	5.27	15.19
P/B ratio	0.86	0.91

Profitability

Metric	FT	GF
Gross margin	86.88%	38.92%
Operating margin	119.92%	1763.53%
Net margin	179.50%	286.83%
ROE	29.45%	17.19%
ROIC	8.38%	26.89%

Dividends

Metric	FT	GF
Dividend yield	6.51%	2.46%
Payout ratio	67.11%	8.27%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FT	GF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.92%	-3.04%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-11.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.76%	-8.77%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FT or GF?: FT has the lower trailing P/E: FT trades at 2.92 and GF at 5.28. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FT or GF?: Over the past five years, FT grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus GF at -3.04%.
Does FT or GF pay a bigger dividend?: FT yields 6.51% and GF yields 2.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FT or GF more profitable?: GF runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus GF at 286.83%.
How have FT and GF total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FT delivered 7.98% and GF delivered 5.26% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FT analysis Full GF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Franklin Universal P/E ratio New Germany Fund P/E ratio Franklin Universal dividend yield New Germany Fund dividend yield Franklin Universal ROE New Germany Fund ROE Franklin Universal operating margin New Germany Fund operating margin Franklin Universal revenue growth New Germany Fund revenue growth

Franklin Universal & New Germany Fund appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 10, 2026.