L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) vs Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP)
A side-by-side comparison of L.B. Foster Company and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
FSTR
L.B. Foster Company
$36.75IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:10 PM EDT
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
$17.38IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:10 PM EDT
Total return — FSTR vs SHIP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yFSTR +196.3% (+11.5%/yr)SHIP -99.6% (-42.4%/yr)FSTR compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FSTR SHIP
FSTR vs SHIP: by the numbers
- •FSTR is the larger company ($384M vs $367M market cap).
- •SHIP trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (6.08 vs 35.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •SHIP converts more revenue to profit (30.69% vs 2.04% net margin).
- •SHIP grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.93% vs 2.05% CAGR).
- •SHIP pays a dividend (3.33% yield), while FSTR is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FSTR | SHIP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.00 | 6.08 |
| Forward P/E | 22.68 | 4.81 |
| P/S ratio | 0.69 | 1.88 |
| P/B ratio | 2.16 | 1.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.51 | 5.49 |
| FCF yield | 10.83% | 2.39% |
Profitability
| Metric | FSTR | SHIP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 21.36% | 39.62% |
| Operating margin | 4.36% | 26.00% |
| Net margin | 2.04% | 30.69% |
| ROE | 6.39% | 19.11% |
| ROIC | 5.30% | 11.84% |
Dividends
| Metric | FSTR | SHIP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.33% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 20.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FSTR | SHIP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.05% | 16.93% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.28% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.02% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.72% | 14.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, FSTR or SHIP?
- SHIP has the lower trailing P/E: FSTR trades at 35.00 and SHIP at 6.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, FSTR or SHIP?
- Over the past five years, SHIP grew revenue faster — FSTR at a 2.05% CAGR versus SHIP at 16.93%.
- Does FSTR or SHIP pay a bigger dividend?
- SHIP pays a dividend (3.33% yield), while FSTR is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is FSTR or SHIP more profitable?
- SHIP runs the higher net margin — FSTR at 2.04% versus SHIP at 30.69%.
- How have FSTR and SHIP total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, FSTR delivered 11.50% and SHIP delivered -43.01% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
L.B. Foster P/E ratioSeanergy Maritime P/E ratioSeanergy Maritime dividend yieldL.B. Foster ROESeanergy Maritime ROEL.B. Foster operating marginSeanergy Maritime operating marginL.B. Foster revenue growthSeanergy Maritime revenue growthL.B. Foster free cash flowSeanergy Maritime free cash flow
L.B. Foster & Seanergy Maritime appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.