Which has the lower trailing P/E, FSTR or MNTK?

FSTR has the lower trailing P/E: FSTR trades at 34.88 and MNTK at 49.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FSTR or MNTK?

Over the past five years, MNTK grew revenue faster — FSTR at a 2.05% CAGR versus MNTK at 10.23%.

Is FSTR or MNTK more profitable?

MNTK runs the higher net margin — FSTR at 2.04% versus MNTK at 4.19%.

How have FSTR and MNTK total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, FSTR delivered 18.72% and MNTK delivered -26.03% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

L.B. Foster Company (FSTR) vs Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK)

A side-by-side comparison of L.B. Foster Company and Montauk Renewables, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FSTR

L.B. Foster Company

$383M

$36.62IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:39 PM EDT

MNTK

Montauk Renewables, Inc.

$390M

$2.74IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:39 PM EDT

Total return — FSTR vs MNTK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

FSTR +145.0% (+16.1%/yr)MNTK -75.2% (-20.7%/yr)FSTR compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FSTR MNTK

FSTR vs MNTK: by the numbers

•MNTK is the larger company ($390M vs $383M market cap).
•FSTR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.88 vs 49.46 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MNTK converts more revenue to profit (4.19% vs 2.04% net margin).
•MNTK grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.23% vs 2.05% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FSTR	MNTK
P/E ratio	34.88	49.46
Forward P/E	22.60	23.94
P/S ratio	0.69	2.06
P/B ratio	2.15	1.47
EV / EBITDA	12.47	15.01
FCF yield	10.87%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	FSTR	MNTK
Gross margin	21.36%	34.69%
Operating margin	4.36%	1.23%
Net margin	2.04%	4.19%
ROE	6.39%	3.00%
ROIC	5.30%	0.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FSTR	MNTK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.05%	10.23%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.28%	-17.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.02%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.72%	-26.03%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FSTR or MNTK?: FSTR has the lower trailing P/E: FSTR trades at 34.88 and MNTK at 49.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FSTR or MNTK?: Over the past five years, MNTK grew revenue faster — FSTR at a 2.05% CAGR versus MNTK at 10.23%.
Is FSTR or MNTK more profitable?: MNTK runs the higher net margin — FSTR at 2.04% versus MNTK at 4.19%.
How have FSTR and MNTK total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, FSTR delivered 18.72% and MNTK delivered -26.03% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FSTR analysis Full MNTK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

L.B. Foster P/E ratio Montauk Renewables P/E ratio L.B. Foster ROE Montauk Renewables ROE L.B. Foster operating margin Montauk Renewables operating margin L.B. Foster revenue growth Montauk Renewables revenue growth L.B. Foster free cash flow Montauk Renewables free cash flow

L.B. Foster & Montauk Renewables appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.