Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) vs Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM)
FRT leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Federal Realty Investment Trust and Kimco Realty Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
$125.84Real Estate
KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation
$25.91Real Estate
Total return — FRT vs KIM
growth of $100 · last 30yFRT +475.1%KIM +181.3%FRT compounded faster
FRT KIM
FRT vs KIM: by the numbers
- •KIM is the larger company ($17.47B vs $10.87B market cap).
- •FRT trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.66 vs 29.44 P/E).
- •FRT converts more revenue to profit (38.61% vs 28.51% net margin).
- •KIM grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.53% vs 9.79% CAGR).
- •KIM pays the higher dividend yield (3.98% vs 3.57%).
Which is better, FRT or KIM?
Metric tally: FRT 9 · KIM 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFRT(lower P/E)
GrowthKIM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKIM(higher dividend yield)
QualityFRT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | FRT | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 21.66● | 29.44 |
| Forward P/E | 40.88 | 30.36● |
| P/S ratio | 8.32 | 8.06● |
| P/B ratio | 3.29 | 1.68● |
| PEG ratio | 0.53 | 0.46● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.46● | 16.47 |
| FCF yield | 4.85%● | 4.48% |
Profitability
| Metric | FRT | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 53.60% | 54.71%● |
| Operating margin | 41.58%● | 36.08% |
| Net margin | 38.61%● | 28.51% |
| ROE | 15.29%● | 5.93% |
| ROIC | 480.25%● | 3.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | FRT | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.57% | 3.98%● |
| Payout ratio | 93.74% | 124.10% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FRT | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.79% | 15.53%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.22%● | -18.16% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 71.36%● | 6.00% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.67% | 7.84%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FRT or KIM?
- It depends on your goal. value: FRT (lower P/E); growth: KIM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KIM (higher dividend yield); quality: FRT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FRT leads 9 to 8.
- Is FRT or KIM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FRT is cheaper: FRT trades at a 21.66 P/E and KIM at 29.44.
- Which has grown faster, FRT or KIM?
- Over the past five years, KIM grew revenue faster — FRT at a 9.79% CAGR versus KIM at 15.53%.
- Does FRT or KIM pay a bigger dividend?
- FRT yields 3.57% and KIM yields 3.98% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FRT or KIM more profitable?
- FRT runs the higher net margin — FRT at 38.61% versus KIM at 28.51%.
- Which has been the better investment, FRT or KIM?
- Over the past 10-year, KIM delivered the higher annualized total return — FRT at 1.63% versus KIM at 3.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Federal Realty Investment P/E ratioKimco Realty P/E ratioFederal Realty Investment dividend yieldKimco Realty dividend yieldFederal Realty Investment ROEKimco Realty ROEFederal Realty Investment operating marginKimco Realty operating marginFederal Realty Investment revenue growthKimco Realty revenue growthFederal Realty Investment free cash flowKimco Realty free cash flow
Federal Realty Investment & Kimco Realty appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.