Which has the lower trailing P/E, FRSH or WK?

FRSH has the lower trailing P/E: FRSH trades at 21.69 and WK at 85.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FRSH or WK?

Over the past five years, FRSH grew revenue faster — FRSH at a 24.02% CAGR versus WK at 19.78%.

Is FRSH or WK more profitable?

FRSH runs the higher net margin — FRSH at 20.49% versus WK at 4.87%.

How have FRSH and WK total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, FRSH delivered -19.95% and WK delivered -12.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) vs Workiva Inc. (WK)

A side-by-side comparison of Freshworks Inc. and Workiva Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FRSH

Freshworks Inc.

$3.88B

$14.03TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:30 PM EDT

Workiva Inc.

$3.81B

$70.07TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:25 PM EDT

Total return — FRSH vs WK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

FRSH -72.2% (-22.6%/yr)WK -51.5% (-13.5%/yr)WK compounded faster over this window

FRSH WK

FRSH vs WK: by the numbers

•FRSH is the larger company ($3.88B vs $3.81B market cap).
•FRSH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.69 vs 85.45 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FRSH converts more revenue to profit (20.49% vs 4.87% net margin).
•FRSH grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.02% vs 19.78% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FRSH	WK
P/E ratio	21.69	85.45
Forward P/E	20.97	N/A
P/S ratio	4.29	3.95
P/B ratio	4.33	N/A
EV / EBITDA	51.77	103.31
FCF yield	5.94%	5.26%

Profitability

Metric	FRSH	WK
Gross margin	84.96%	80.21%
Operating margin	3.35%	-4.80%
Net margin	20.49%	4.87%
ROE	20.67%	N/A
ROIC	3.16%	3.92%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FRSH	WK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.02%	19.78%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	54.85%	35.92%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-19.95%	-12.35%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FRSH or WK?: FRSH has the lower trailing P/E: FRSH trades at 21.69 and WK at 85.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FRSH or WK?: Over the past five years, FRSH grew revenue faster — FRSH at a 24.02% CAGR versus WK at 19.78%.
Is FRSH or WK more profitable?: FRSH runs the higher net margin — FRSH at 20.49% versus WK at 4.87%.
How have FRSH and WK total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, FRSH delivered -19.95% and WK delivered -12.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FRSH analysis Full WK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Freshworks P/E ratio Workiva P/E ratio Freshworks ROE Workiva ROE Freshworks operating margin Workiva operating margin Freshworks revenue growth Workiva revenue growth Freshworks free cash flow Workiva free cash flow

Freshworks & Workiva appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.