Which has grown faster, FOSL or LOCO?

Over the past five years, LOCO grew revenue faster — FOSL at a -10.72% CAGR versus LOCO at 2.11%.

Is FOSL or LOCO more profitable?

LOCO runs the higher net margin — FOSL at -7.09% versus LOCO at 6.96%.

How have FOSL and LOCO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FOSL delivered -13.00% and LOCO delivered 3.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) vs El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO)

A side-by-side comparison of Fossil Group, Inc. and El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FOSL

Fossil Group, Inc.

$427M

$7.22Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:25 AM EDT

LOCO

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.

$439M

$14.43Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:24 AM EDT

Total return — FOSL vs LOCO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FOSL -74.1% (-12.6%/yr)LOCO +41.6% (+3.5%/yr)LOCO compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FOSL LOCO

FOSL vs LOCO: by the numbers

•LOCO is the larger company ($439M vs $427M market cap).
•LOCO is profitable (6.96% net margin) while FOSL runs a net loss (-7.09%).
•LOCO grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.11% vs -10.72% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FOSL	LOCO
P/E ratio	N/A	12.33
Forward P/E	N/A	14.06
PEG ratio	N/A	2.14
P/S ratio	0.43	0.88
P/B ratio	4.75	1.39
EV / EBITDA	25.61	9.27
FCF yield	N/A	9.33%

Profitability

Metric	FOSL	LOCO
Gross margin	56.73%	28.32%
Operating margin	1.58%	10.58%
Net margin	-7.09%	6.96%
ROE	-77.74%	11.00%
ROIC	3.84%	7.04%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FOSL	LOCO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-10.72%	2.11%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	5.39%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	-5.56%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-10.05%	-0.27%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, FOSL or LOCO?: Over the past five years, LOCO grew revenue faster — FOSL at a -10.72% CAGR versus LOCO at 2.11%.
Is FOSL or LOCO more profitable?: LOCO runs the higher net margin — FOSL at -7.09% versus LOCO at 6.96%.
How have FOSL and LOCO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FOSL delivered -13.00% and LOCO delivered 3.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FOSL analysis Full LOCO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

El Pollo Loco P/E ratio Fossil ROE El Pollo Loco ROE Fossil operating margin El Pollo Loco operating margin Fossil revenue growth El Pollo Loco revenue growth Fossil free cash flow El Pollo Loco free cash flow

Fossil & El Pollo Loco appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.