FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
SIMO leads on 13 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of FormFactor, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FORM
FormFactor, Inc.
$139.21Technology
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$280.49Technology
Not enough overlapping price history to compare FORM and SIMO.
FORM vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •FORM is the larger company ($10.85B vs $9.41B market cap).
- •SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.85 vs 160.01 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 8.14% net margin).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 3.14% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while FORM does not currently pay one.
Which is better, FORM or SIMO?
Metric tally: FORM 2 · SIMO 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSIMO(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | FORM | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 160.01 | 21.85● |
| Forward P/E | 56.75 | 32.07● |
| P/S ratio | 13.16 | 2.66● |
| P/B ratio | 10.44 | 2.84● |
| PEG ratio | 31.44 | 0.17● |
| EV / EBITDA | 86.84 | 12.65● |
| FCF yield | 0.33%● | 0.27% |
Profitability
| Metric | FORM | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 42.11% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | 12.70% | 12.77% |
| Net margin | 8.14% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | 6.45% | 18.76%● |
| ROIC | 4.67% | 9.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FORM | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.71% |
| Payout ratio | — | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FORM | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.14% | 12.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.09% | 44.85%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -19.02%● | -42.00% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 32.69% | 37.00%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FORM or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 13 to 2.
- Is FORM or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: FORM trades at a 160.01 P/E and SIMO at 21.85.
- Which has grown faster, FORM or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — FORM at a 3.14% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does FORM or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while FORM does not currently pay one.
- Is FORM or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — FORM at 8.14% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, FORM or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, FORM delivered the higher annualized total return — FORM at 33.49% versus SIMO at 23.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
FormFactor P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioFormFactor dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldFormFactor ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEFormFactor operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginFormFactor revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthFormFactor free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
FormFactor & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.