Which has the lower trailing P/E, FORM or SIMO?

SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: FORM trades at 113.56 and SIMO at 19.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FORM or SIMO?

Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — FORM at a 3.14% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.

Does FORM or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.82% yield), while FORM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is FORM or SIMO more profitable?

SIMO runs the higher net margin — FORM at 8.14% versus SIMO at 16.02%.

How have FORM and SIMO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FORM delivered 25.93% and SIMO delivered 19.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

A side-by-side comparison of FormFactor, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FORM

FormFactor, Inc.

$6.88B

$88.23TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SIMO

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

$7.43B

$221.42TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FORM vs SIMO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21y

FORM +278.7%SIMO +3181.3%SIMO compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FORM SIMO

FORM vs SIMO: by the numbers

•SIMO is the larger company ($7.43B vs $6.88B market cap).
•SIMO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.04 vs 113.56 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 8.14% net margin).
•SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 3.14% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.82% yield), while FORM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FORM	SIMO
P/E ratio	113.56	19.04
Forward P/E	40.14	27.53
P/S ratio	9.34	2.32
P/B ratio	7.41	2.47
PEG ratio	N/A	0.17
EV / EBITDA	51.13	15.02
FCF yield	0.47%	0.31%

Profitability

Metric	FORM	SIMO
Gross margin	42.11%	48.09%
Operating margin	12.70%	12.77%
Net margin	8.14%	16.02%
ROE	6.45%	18.76%
ROIC	4.67%	9.22%

Dividends

Metric	FORM	SIMO
Dividend yield	N/A	0.82%
Payout ratio	N/A	13.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FORM	SIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.14%	12.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-7.27%	44.85%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-19.02%	-42.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	23.22%	35.17%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FORM or SIMO?: SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: FORM trades at 113.56 and SIMO at 19.04. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FORM or SIMO?: Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — FORM at a 3.14% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
Does FORM or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.82% yield), while FORM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is FORM or SIMO more profitable?: SIMO runs the higher net margin — FORM at 8.14% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
How have FORM and SIMO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FORM delivered 25.93% and SIMO delivered 19.38% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FORM analysis Full SIMO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

FormFactor P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio FormFactor dividend yield Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield FormFactor ROE Silicon Motion Technology ROE FormFactor operating margin Silicon Motion Technology operating margin FormFactor revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth FormFactor free cash flow Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow

FormFactor & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings

Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.