Which has the lower trailing P/E, FORM or SIMO?

SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: FORM trades at 79.28 and SIMO at 8.33. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FORM or SIMO?

Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — FORM at a 3.77% CAGR versus SIMO at 14.30%.

Does FORM or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.72% yield), while FORM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is FORM or SIMO more profitable?

SIMO runs the higher net margin — FORM at 12.80% versus SIMO at 22.06%.

How have FORM and SIMO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FORM delivered 27.71% and SIMO delivered 21.09% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

A side-by-side comparison of FormFactor, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FORM

FormFactor, Inc.

$8.96B

$114.95TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SIMO

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

$9.55B

$284.48TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FORM vs SIMO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FORM +886.3% (+25.7%/yr)SIMO +555.5% (+20.7%/yr)FORM compounded faster over this window

FORM SIMO

FORM vs SIMO: by the numbers

•SIMO is the larger company ($9.55B vs $8.96B market cap).
•SIMO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.33 vs 79.28 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SIMO converts more revenue to profit (22.06% vs 12.80% net margin).
•SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.30% vs 3.77% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.72% yield), while FORM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FORM	SIMO
P/E ratio	79.28	8.33
Forward P/E	37.71	25.42
P/S ratio	9.93	7.27
P/B ratio	8.06	9.12
EV / EBITDA	45.97	38.43
FCF yield	1.52%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	FORM	SIMO
Gross margin	45.64%	48.87%
Operating margin	8.18%	16.31%
Net margin	12.80%	22.06%
ROE	10.39%	27.68%
ROIC	11.16%	14.77%

Dividends

Metric	FORM	SIMO
Dividend yield	N/A	0.72%
Payout ratio	N/A	5.85%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FORM	SIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.77%	14.30%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-7.27%	44.85%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-36.53%	-42.22%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	23.23%	32.37%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FORM or SIMO?: SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: FORM trades at 79.28 and SIMO at 8.33. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FORM or SIMO?: Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — FORM at a 3.77% CAGR versus SIMO at 14.30%.
Does FORM or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.72% yield), while FORM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is FORM or SIMO more profitable?: SIMO runs the higher net margin — FORM at 12.80% versus SIMO at 22.06%.
How have FORM and SIMO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FORM delivered 27.71% and SIMO delivered 21.09% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FORM analysis Full SIMO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

FormFactor P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield FormFactor ROE Silicon Motion Technology ROE FormFactor operating margin Silicon Motion Technology operating margin FormFactor revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth FormFactor free cash flow Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow

FormFactor & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.