Which has the lower trailing P/E, FORM or SANM?

SANM has the lower trailing P/E: FORM trades at 102.86 and SANM at 40.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FORM or SANM?

Over the past five years, SANM grew revenue faster — FORM at a 3.77% CAGR versus SANM at 12.21%.

Is FORM or SANM more profitable?

FORM runs the higher net margin — FORM at 12.80% versus SANM at 2.41%.

How have FORM and SANM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FORM delivered 29.90% and SANM delivered 22.79% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) vs Sanmina Corporation (SANM)

A side-by-side comparison of FormFactor, Inc. and Sanmina Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FORM

FormFactor, Inc.

$11.63B

$149.15TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SANM

Sanmina Corporation

$12.28B

$229.04TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FORM vs SANM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FORM +1250.7% (+29.7%/yr)SANM +698.7% (+23.1%/yr)FORM compounded faster over this window

FORM SANM

FORM vs SANM: by the numbers

•SANM is the larger company ($12.28B vs $11.63B market cap).
•SANM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (40.97 vs 102.86 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FORM converts more revenue to profit (12.80% vs 2.41% net margin).
•SANM grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.21% vs 3.77% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FORM	SANM
P/E ratio	102.86	40.97
Forward P/E	48.93	16.44
PEG ratio	N/A	2.30
P/S ratio	12.89	0.96
P/B ratio	10.46	4.80
EV / EBITDA	59.76	15.81
FCF yield	1.17%	4.84%

Profitability

Metric	FORM	SANM
Gross margin	45.64%	9.01%
Operating margin	8.18%	5.09%
Net margin	12.80%	2.41%
ROE	10.39%	12.04%
ROIC	11.16%	8.27%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FORM	SANM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.77%	12.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-7.27%	17.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-36.53%	18.86%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	31.33%	41.47%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FORM or SANM?: SANM has the lower trailing P/E: FORM trades at 102.86 and SANM at 40.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FORM or SANM?: Over the past five years, SANM grew revenue faster — FORM at a 3.77% CAGR versus SANM at 12.21%.
Is FORM or SANM more profitable?: FORM runs the higher net margin — FORM at 12.80% versus SANM at 2.41%.
How have FORM and SANM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FORM delivered 29.90% and SANM delivered 22.79% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FORM analysis Full SANM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

FormFactor P/E ratio Sanmina P/E ratio FormFactor ROE Sanmina ROE FormFactor operating margin Sanmina operating margin FormFactor revenue growth Sanmina revenue growth FormFactor free cash flow Sanmina free cash flow

FormFactor & Sanmina appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.