Is FN or ONTO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, FN is cheaper: FN trades at a 45.38 P/E and ONTO at 164.23.

Which has grown faster, FN or ONTO?

Over the past five years, FN grew revenue faster — FN at a 18.99% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.93%.

Is FN or ONTO more profitable?

ONTO runs the higher net margin — FN at 9.87% versus ONTO at 10.33%.

Which has been the better investment, FN or ONTO?

Over the past 10-year, ONTO delivered the higher annualized total return — FN at 30.73% versus ONTO at 33.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fabrinet (FN) vs Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)

FN leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Fabrinet and Onto Innovation Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 30, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — FN vs ONTO

growth of $100 · last 16y

FN +4813.8%ONTO +3119.9%FN compounded faster

FN ONTO

FN vs ONTO: by the numbers

•FN is the larger company ($20.14B vs $18.83B market cap).
•FN trades at the lower earnings multiple (45.38 vs 164.23 P/E).
•ONTO converts more revenue to profit (10.33% vs 9.87% net margin).
•FN grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.99% vs 11.93% CAGR).

Which is better, FN or ONTO?

Metric tally: FN 8 · ONTO 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFN(lower P/E)

GrowthFN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityFN(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FN	ONTO
P/E ratio	45.38●	164.23
Forward P/E	38.26	—
P/S ratio	4.52●	17.05
P/B ratio	8.30	8.24
PEG ratio	2.47●	4.77
EV / EBITDA	39.47●	91.92
FCF yield	0.24%	1.36%●

Profitability

Metric	FN	ONTO
Gross margin	11.96%	48.80%●
Operating margin	9.78%	10.53%●
Net margin	9.87%	10.33%●
ROE	18.14%●	4.99%
ROIC	15.01%●	5.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FN	ONTO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.99%●	11.93%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.62%	34.40%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-9.50%	11.03%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	40.45%●	36.77%

Frequently asked

Which is better, FN or ONTO?: It depends on your goal. value: FN (lower P/E); growth: FN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FN leads 8 to 6.
Is FN or ONTO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FN is cheaper: FN trades at a 45.38 P/E and ONTO at 164.23.
Which has grown faster, FN or ONTO?: Over the past five years, FN grew revenue faster — FN at a 18.99% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.93%.
Is FN or ONTO more profitable?: ONTO runs the higher net margin — FN at 9.87% versus ONTO at 10.33%.
Which has been the better investment, FN or ONTO?: Over the past 10-year, ONTO delivered the higher annualized total return — FN at 30.73% versus ONTO at 33.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FN analysis Full ONTO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fabrinet P/E ratio Onto Innovation P/E ratio Fabrinet dividend yield Onto Innovation dividend yield Fabrinet ROE Onto Innovation ROE Fabrinet operating margin Onto Innovation operating margin Fabrinet revenue growth Onto Innovation revenue growth Fabrinet free cash flow Onto Innovation free cash flow

Fabrinet & Onto Innovation appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 30, 2026.