Which has grown faster, FLUT or TSCO?

Over the past five years, FLUT grew revenue faster — FLUT at a 22.11% CAGR versus TSCO at 5.80%.

Does FLUT or TSCO pay a bigger dividend?

TSCO pays a dividend (2.79% yield), while FLUT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is FLUT or TSCO more profitable?

TSCO runs the higher net margin — FLUT at -4.63% versus TSCO at 6.42%.

How have FLUT and TSCO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FLUT delivered -0.70% and TSCO delivered 11.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) vs Tractor Supply Company (TSCO)

A side-by-side comparison of Flutter Entertainment plc and Tractor Supply Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FLUT

Flutter Entertainment plc

$17.45B

$100.56Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TSCO

Tractor Supply Company

$17.31B

$33.01Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FLUT vs TSCO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FLUT -5.4% (-0.6%/yr)TSCO +139.4% (+9.1%/yr)TSCO compounded faster over this window

FLUT TSCO

FLUT vs TSCO: by the numbers

•FLUT is the larger company ($17.45B vs $17.31B market cap).
•TSCO is profitable (6.42% net margin) while FLUT runs a net loss (-4.63%).
•FLUT grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.11% vs 5.80% CAGR).
•TSCO pays a dividend (2.79% yield), while FLUT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FLUT	TSCO
P/E ratio	N/A	17.19
Forward P/E	20.70	17.07
P/S ratio	1.02	1.10
P/B ratio	1.99	6.58
EV / EBITDA	18.41	12.35
FCF yield	4.36%	1.77%

Profitability

Metric	FLUT	TSCO
Gross margin	42.46%	32.47%
Operating margin	-0.72%	8.91%
Net margin	-4.63%	6.42%
ROE	-9.09%	38.45%
ROIC	-0.53%	11.81%

Dividends

Metric	FLUT	TSCO
Dividend yield	N/A	2.79%
Payout ratio	N/A	49.48%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FLUT	TSCO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.11%	5.80%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-36.84%	9.98%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.14%	-17.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-13.38%	-1.57%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, FLUT or TSCO?: Over the past five years, FLUT grew revenue faster — FLUT at a 22.11% CAGR versus TSCO at 5.80%.
Does FLUT or TSCO pay a bigger dividend?: TSCO pays a dividend (2.79% yield), while FLUT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is FLUT or TSCO more profitable?: TSCO runs the higher net margin — FLUT at -4.63% versus TSCO at 6.42%.
How have FLUT and TSCO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FLUT delivered -0.70% and TSCO delivered 11.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FLUT analysis Full TSCO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Tractor Supply P/E ratio Tractor Supply dividend yield Flutter Entertainment ROE Tractor Supply ROE Flutter Entertainment operating margin Tractor Supply operating margin Flutter Entertainment revenue growth Tractor Supply revenue growth Flutter Entertainment free cash flow Tractor Supply free cash flow

Flutter Entertainment & Tractor Supply appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.