Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) vs Tractor Supply Company (TSCO)
TSCO leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Flutter Entertainment plc and Tractor Supply Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
$110.65Consumer Cyclical
TSCO
Tractor Supply Company
$31.25Consumer Cyclical
Not enough overlapping price history to compare FLUT and TSCO.
FLUT vs TSCO: by the numbers
- •FLUT is the larger company ($19.19B vs $16.39B market cap).
- •TSCO is profitable (6.91% net margin) while FLUT runs a net loss (-2.91%).
- •FLUT grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.11% vs 6.44% CAGR).
- •TSCO pays a dividend (3.01% yield) while FLUT does not currently pay one.
Which is better, FLUT or TSCO?
Metric tally: FLUT 5 · TSCO 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthFLUT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityTSCO(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | FLUT | TSCO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 15.32 |
| Forward P/E | 13.35 | 13.57 |
| P/S ratio | 1.16 | 1.05● |
| P/B ratio | 2.19● | 6.57 |
| PEG ratio | — | 25.47 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.09 | 11.62● |
| FCF yield | 3.68%● | 3.35% |
Profitability
| Metric | FLUT | TSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.25%● | 32.46% |
| Operating margin | 2.40% | 9.28%● |
| Net margin | -2.91% | 6.91%● |
| ROE | -5.47% | 43.01%● |
| ROIC | 2.26% | 13.11%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FLUT | TSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 3.01% |
| Payout ratio | — | 45.41% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FLUT | TSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.11%● | 6.44% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -36.84% | 14.09%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 0.14%● | -13.18% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -10.38% | -1.52%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FLUT or TSCO?
- It depends on your goal. growth: FLUT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TSCO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TSCO leads 8 to 5.
- Which has grown faster, FLUT or TSCO?
- Over the past five years, FLUT grew revenue faster — FLUT at a 22.11% CAGR versus TSCO at 6.44%.
- Does FLUT or TSCO pay a bigger dividend?
- TSCO pays a dividend (3.01% yield) while FLUT does not currently pay one.
- Is FLUT or TSCO more profitable?
- TSCO runs the higher net margin — FLUT at -2.91% versus TSCO at 6.91%.
- Which has been the better investment, FLUT or TSCO?
- Over the past 10-year, TSCO delivered the higher annualized total return — FLUT at -0.74% versus TSCO at 7.03%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Flutter Entertainment P/E ratioTractor Supply P/E ratioFlutter Entertainment dividend yieldTractor Supply dividend yieldFlutter Entertainment ROETractor Supply ROEFlutter Entertainment operating marginTractor Supply operating marginFlutter Entertainment revenue growthTractor Supply revenue growthFlutter Entertainment free cash flowTractor Supply free cash flow
Flutter Entertainment & Tractor Supply appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.