Is FLR or MATX cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MATX is cheaper: FLR trades at a 26.59 P/E and MATX at 14.12.

Which has grown faster, FLR or MATX?

Over the past five years, MATX grew revenue faster — FLR at a 1.92% CAGR versus MATX at 5.17%.

Does FLR or MATX pay a bigger dividend?

MATX pays a dividend (0.79% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.

Is FLR or MATX more profitable?

MATX runs the higher net margin — FLR at 2.30% versus MATX at 12.92%.

Which has been the better investment, FLR or MATX?

Over the past 10-year, MATX delivered the higher annualized total return — FLR at 1.47% versus MATX at 21.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fluor Corporation (FLR) vs Matson, Inc. (MATX)

MATX leads on 12 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Fluor Corporation and Matson, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 1, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — FLR vs MATX

growth of $100 · last 26y

FLR +288.1%MATX +1269.2%MATX compounded faster

FLR MATX

FLR vs MATX: by the numbers

•FLR is the larger company ($7.04B vs $6.27B market cap).
•MATX trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.12 vs 26.59 P/E).
•MATX converts more revenue to profit (12.92% vs 2.30% net margin).
•MATX grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.17% vs 1.92% CAGR).
•MATX pays a dividend (0.79% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, FLR or MATX?

Metric tally: FLR 2 · MATX 12

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMATX(lower P/E)

GrowthMATX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityMATX(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FLR	MATX
P/E ratio	26.59	14.12●
Forward P/E	20.19	13.27●
P/S ratio	0.61●	1.77
P/B ratio	3.21	2.15●
PEG ratio	1.25	0.55●
EV / EBITDA	—	9.06
FCF yield	—	7.11%

Profitability

Metric	FLR	MATX
Gross margin	-1.63%	22.42%●
Operating margin	-3.40%	13.50%●
Net margin	2.30%	12.92%●
ROE	12.19%	15.72%●
ROIC	1.84%	8.85%●

Dividends

Metric	FLR	MATX
Dividend yield	—	0.79%
Payout ratio	—	10.83%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FLR	MATX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	1.92%	5.17%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	40.81%●	25.67%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.28%	7.72%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	24.24%	26.26%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, FLR or MATX?: It depends on your goal. value: MATX (lower P/E); growth: MATX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MATX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MATX leads 12 to 2.
Is FLR or MATX cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MATX is cheaper: FLR trades at a 26.59 P/E and MATX at 14.12.
Which has grown faster, FLR or MATX?: Over the past five years, MATX grew revenue faster — FLR at a 1.92% CAGR versus MATX at 5.17%.
Does FLR or MATX pay a bigger dividend?: MATX pays a dividend (0.79% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.
Is FLR or MATX more profitable?: MATX runs the higher net margin — FLR at 2.30% versus MATX at 12.92%.
Which has been the better investment, FLR or MATX?: Over the past 10-year, MATX delivered the higher annualized total return — FLR at 1.47% versus MATX at 21.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FLR analysis Full MATX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fluor P/E ratio Matson P/E ratio Fluor dividend yield Matson dividend yield Fluor ROE Matson ROE Fluor operating margin Matson operating margin Fluor revenue growth Matson revenue growth Fluor free cash flow Matson free cash flow

Fluor & Matson appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 1, 2026.