Which has the lower trailing P/E, FLO or SENEB?

SENEB has the lower trailing P/E: FLO trades at 22.08 and SENEB at 9.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FLO or SENEB?

Over the past five years, SENEB grew revenue faster — FLO at a 3.20% CAGR versus SENEB at 3.61%.

Does FLO or SENEB pay a bigger dividend?

FLO pays a dividend (13.30% yield), while SENEB is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is FLO or SENEB more profitable?

SENEB runs the higher net margin — FLO at 1.06% versus SENEB at 6.75%.

How have FLO and SENEB total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FLO delivered -5.44% and SENEB delivered 17.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) vs Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB)

A side-by-side comparison of Flowers Foods, Inc. and Seneca Foods Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FLO

Flowers Foods, Inc.

$1.22B

$5.74Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SENEB

Seneca Foods Corporation

$1.20B

$172.48Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:49 PM EDT

Total return — FLO vs SENEB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FLO -43.1% (-5.5%/yr)SENEB +407.7% (+17.6%/yr)SENEB compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FLO SENEB

FLO vs SENEB: by the numbers

•FLO is the larger company ($1.22B vs $1.20B market cap).
•SENEB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.96 vs 22.08 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SENEB converts more revenue to profit (6.75% vs 1.06% net margin).
•SENEB grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.61% vs 3.20% CAGR).
•FLO pays a dividend (13.30% yield), while SENEB is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FLO	SENEB
P/E ratio	22.08	9.96
Forward P/E	7.27	12.47
PEG ratio	N/A	2.57
P/S ratio	0.23	0.68
P/B ratio	0.92	1.55
EV / EBITDA	2.99	6.88
FCF yield	25.96%	19.10%

Profitability

Metric	FLO	SENEB
Gross margin	47.89%	13.42%
Operating margin	5.46%	8.57%
Net margin	1.06%	6.75%
ROE	4.17%	15.40%
ROIC	5.41%	10.76%

Dividends

Metric	FLO	SENEB
Dividend yield	13.30%	N/A
Payout ratio	286.54%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FLO	SENEB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.20%	3.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-11.08%	3.92%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	20.81%	14.74%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.67%	29.76%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FLO or SENEB?: SENEB has the lower trailing P/E: FLO trades at 22.08 and SENEB at 9.96. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FLO or SENEB?: Over the past five years, SENEB grew revenue faster — FLO at a 3.20% CAGR versus SENEB at 3.61%.
Does FLO or SENEB pay a bigger dividend?: FLO pays a dividend (13.30% yield), while SENEB is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is FLO or SENEB more profitable?: SENEB runs the higher net margin — FLO at 1.06% versus SENEB at 6.75%.
How have FLO and SENEB total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FLO delivered -5.44% and SENEB delivered 17.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FLO analysis Full SENEB analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Flowers Foods P/E ratio Seneca Foods P/E ratio Flowers Foods dividend yield Flowers Foods ROE Seneca Foods ROE Flowers Foods operating margin Seneca Foods operating margin Flowers Foods revenue growth Seneca Foods revenue growth Flowers Foods free cash flow Seneca Foods free cash flow

Flowers Foods & Seneca Foods appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.