Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) vs W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW)
GWW leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and W.W. Grainger, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
$1954.47Industrials
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
$1374.78Industrials
Total return — FIX vs GWW
growth of $100 · last 29yFIX +12316.8%GWW +3458.8%FIX compounded faster
FIX GWW
FIX vs GWW: by the numbers
- •FIX is the larger company ($69.88B vs $64.91B market cap).
- •GWW trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.96 vs 56.39 P/E).
- •FIX converts more revenue to profit (12.07% vs 9.70% net margin).
- •FIX grew revenue faster over the past five years (29.10% vs 9.12% CAGR).
- •GWW pays the higher dividend yield (0.67% vs 0.13%).
Which is better, FIX or GWW?
Metric tally: FIX 8 · GWW 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGWW(lower P/E)
GrowthFIX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeGWW(higher dividend yield)
QualityFIX(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FIX | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 56.39 | 36.96● |
| Forward P/E | 45.30 | 30.14● |
| P/S ratio | 6.80 | 3.55● |
| P/B ratio | 24.47 | 16.58● |
| PEG ratio | 0.33● | 1.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 39.34 | 23.32● |
| FCF yield | 2.01% | 2.12%● |
Profitability
| Metric | FIX | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 25.13% | 39.15%● |
| Operating margin | 15.69%● | 14.23% |
| Net margin | 12.07%● | 9.70% |
| ROE | 43.47% | 45.34%● |
| ROIC | 33.59%● | 27.73% |
Dividends
| Metric | FIX | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 0.67%● |
| Payout ratio | 8.99% | 26.13% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FIX | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 29.10%● | 9.12% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 47.75%● | 22.25% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 33.37%● | 7.67% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 91.26%● | 26.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FIX or GWW?
- It depends on your goal. value: GWW (lower P/E); growth: FIX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GWW (higher dividend yield); quality: FIX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GWW leads 9 to 8.
- Is FIX or GWW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GWW is cheaper: FIX trades at a 56.39 P/E and GWW at 36.96.
- Which has grown faster, FIX or GWW?
- Over the past five years, FIX grew revenue faster — FIX at a 29.10% CAGR versus GWW at 9.12%.
- Does FIX or GWW pay a bigger dividend?
- FIX yields 0.13% and GWW yields 0.67% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FIX or GWW more profitable?
- FIX runs the higher net margin — FIX at 12.07% versus GWW at 9.70%.
- Which has been the better investment, FIX or GWW?
- Over the past 10-year, FIX delivered the higher annualized total return — FIX at 52.42% versus GWW at 22.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Comfort Systems USA P/E ratioW.W. Grainger P/E ratioComfort Systems USA dividend yieldW.W. Grainger dividend yieldComfort Systems USA ROEW.W. Grainger ROEComfort Systems USA operating marginW.W. Grainger operating marginComfort Systems USA revenue growthW.W. Grainger revenue growthComfort Systems USA free cash flowW.W. Grainger free cash flow
Comfort Systems USA & W.W. Grainger appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.