Is FITB or NDAQ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, FITB is cheaper: FITB trades at a 18.90 P/E and NDAQ at 23.66.

Which has grown faster, FITB or NDAQ?

Over the past five years, FITB grew revenue faster — FITB at a 11.54% CAGR versus NDAQ at 6.89%.

Does FITB or NDAQ pay a bigger dividend?

FITB yields 2.84% and NDAQ yields 1.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FITB or NDAQ more profitable?

NDAQ runs the higher net margin — FITB at 15.91% versus NDAQ at 23.15%.

Which has been the better investment, FITB or NDAQ?

Over the past 10-year, FITB delivered the higher annualized total return — FITB at 16.38% versus NDAQ at 15.93%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) vs Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ)

FITB leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Fifth Third Bancorp and Nasdaq, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

FITB

Fifth Third Bancorp

$51.03B

$56.31Financial Services

NDAQ

Nasdaq, Inc.

$44.43B

$78.56Financial Services

Total return — FITB vs NDAQ

growth of $100 · last 24y

FITB -15.5%NDAQ +1471.2%NDAQ compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FITB NDAQ

FITB vs NDAQ: by the numbers

•FITB is the larger company ($51.03B vs $44.43B market cap).
•FITB trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.90 vs 23.66 P/E).
•NDAQ converts more revenue to profit (23.15% vs 15.91% net margin).
•FITB grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.54% vs 6.89% CAGR).
•FITB pays the higher dividend yield (2.84% vs 1.58%).

Which is better, FITB or NDAQ?

Metric tally: FITB 9 · NDAQ 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFITB(lower P/E)

GrowthFITB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeFITB(higher dividend yield)

QualityFITB(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FITB	NDAQ
P/E ratio	18.90●	23.66
Forward P/E	18.38	17.64●
P/S ratio	3.42●	5.43
P/B ratio	1.37●	3.73
PEG ratio	1.07	0.51●

Profitability

Metric	FITB	NDAQ
Gross margin	66.60%●	54.81%
Operating margin	20.24%	29.53%●
Net margin	15.91%	23.15%●
ROE	6.37%	15.90%●
ROIC	8.90%●	8.26%

Dividends

Metric	FITB	NDAQ
Dividend yield	2.84%●	1.58%
Payout ratio	45.07%	39.62%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FITB	NDAQ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.54%●	6.89%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.05%●	10.62%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.42%●	7.21%

Frequently asked

Which is better, FITB or NDAQ?: It depends on your goal. value: FITB (lower P/E); growth: FITB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FITB (higher dividend yield); quality: FITB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FITB leads 9 to 5.
Is FITB or NDAQ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FITB is cheaper: FITB trades at a 18.90 P/E and NDAQ at 23.66.
Which has grown faster, FITB or NDAQ?: Over the past five years, FITB grew revenue faster — FITB at a 11.54% CAGR versus NDAQ at 6.89%.
Does FITB or NDAQ pay a bigger dividend?: FITB yields 2.84% and NDAQ yields 1.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FITB or NDAQ more profitable?: NDAQ runs the higher net margin — FITB at 15.91% versus NDAQ at 23.15%.
Which has been the better investment, FITB or NDAQ?: Over the past 10-year, FITB delivered the higher annualized total return — FITB at 16.38% versus NDAQ at 15.93%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FITB analysis Full NDAQ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fifth Third Bancorp P/E ratio Nasdaq P/E ratio Fifth Third Bancorp dividend yield Nasdaq dividend yield Fifth Third Bancorp ROE Nasdaq ROE Fifth Third Bancorp operating margin Nasdaq operating margin Fifth Third Bancorp revenue growth Nasdaq revenue growth Fifth Third Bancorp free cash flow Nasdaq free cash flow

Fifth Third Bancorp & Nasdaq appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.