Is FISV or NTAP cheaper?

On trailing earnings, FISV is cheaper: FISV trades at a 9.12 P/E and NTAP at 25.41.

Which has grown faster, FISV or NTAP?

Over the past five years, FISV grew revenue faster — FISV at a 7.29% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.18%.

Does FISV or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?

NTAP pays a dividend (1.29% yield) while FISV does not currently pay one.

Is FISV or NTAP more profitable?

NTAP runs the higher net margin — FISV at 15.17% versus NTAP at 18.43%.

Which has been the better investment, FISV or NTAP?

Over the past 10-year, NTAP delivered the higher annualized total return — FISV at 0.11% versus NTAP at 23.82%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) vs NetApp, Inc. (NTAP)

FISV leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Fiserv, Inc. and NetApp, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — FISV vs NTAP

growth of $100 · last 30y

FISV +2208.2%NTAP +7347.5%NTAP compounded faster

FISV NTAP

FISV vs NTAP: by the numbers

•NTAP is the larger company ($31.66B vs $28.68B market cap).
•FISV trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.12 vs 25.41 P/E).
•NTAP converts more revenue to profit (18.43% vs 15.17% net margin).
•FISV grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.29% vs 4.18% CAGR).
•NTAP pays a dividend (1.29% yield) while FISV does not currently pay one.

Which is better, FISV or NTAP?

Metric tally: FISV 9 · NTAP 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFISV(lower P/E)

GrowthFISV(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityNTAP(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	FISV	NTAP
P/E ratio	9.12●	25.41
Forward P/E	6.02●	20.24
P/S ratio	1.37●	4.64
P/B ratio	1.10●	23.80
PEG ratio	0.62●	1.57
EV / EBITDA	7.25●	16.77
FCF yield	14.43%●	5.81%

Profitability

Metric	FISV	NTAP
Gross margin	58.07%	70.74%●
Operating margin	24.38%	24.12%
Net margin	15.17%	18.43%●
ROE	12.21%	94.45%●
ROIC	8.03%	19.40%●

Dividends

Metric	FISV	NTAP
Dividend yield	—	1.29%
Payout ratio	—	32.35%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FISV	NTAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.29%●	4.18%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	34.70%●	10.39%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.58%	12.50%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-13.36%	16.84%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, FISV or NTAP?: It depends on your goal. value: FISV (lower P/E); growth: FISV (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NTAP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FISV leads 9 to 6.
Is FISV or NTAP cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FISV is cheaper: FISV trades at a 9.12 P/E and NTAP at 25.41.
Which has grown faster, FISV or NTAP?: Over the past five years, FISV grew revenue faster — FISV at a 7.29% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.18%.
Does FISV or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?: NTAP pays a dividend (1.29% yield) while FISV does not currently pay one.
Is FISV or NTAP more profitable?: NTAP runs the higher net margin — FISV at 15.17% versus NTAP at 18.43%.
Which has been the better investment, FISV or NTAP?: Over the past 10-year, NTAP delivered the higher annualized total return — FISV at 0.11% versus NTAP at 23.82%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FISV analysis Full NTAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fiserv P/E ratio NetApp P/E ratio Fiserv dividend yield NetApp dividend yield Fiserv ROE NetApp ROE Fiserv operating margin NetApp operating margin Fiserv revenue growth NetApp revenue growth Fiserv free cash flow NetApp free cash flow

Fiserv & NetApp appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.