Is FIS or ONTO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, FIS is cheaper: FIS trades at a 7.38 P/E and ONTO at 155.96.

Which has grown faster, FIS or ONTO?

Over the past five years, ONTO grew revenue faster — FIS at a -1.69% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.93%.

Does FIS or ONTO pay a bigger dividend?

FIS pays a dividend (4.40% yield) while ONTO does not currently pay one.

Is FIS or ONTO more profitable?

FIS runs the higher net margin — FIS at 22.91% versus ONTO at 10.33%.

Which has been the better investment, FIS or ONTO?

Over the past 10-year, ONTO delivered the higher annualized total return — FIS at -4.48% versus ONTO at 33.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) vs Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)

FIS leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

FIS

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Total return — FIS vs ONTO

growth of $100 · last 25y

FIS +192.6%ONTO +1198.7%ONTO compounded faster

FIS ONTO

FIS vs ONTO: by the numbers

•FIS is the larger company ($19.75B vs $16.60B market cap).
•FIS trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.38 vs 155.96 P/E).
•FIS converts more revenue to profit (22.91% vs 10.33% net margin).
•ONTO grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.93% vs -1.69% CAGR).
•FIS pays a dividend (4.40% yield) while ONTO does not currently pay one.

Which is better, FIS or ONTO?

Metric tally: FIS 9 · ONTO 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFIS(lower P/E)

GrowthONTO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityONTO(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FIS	ONTO
P/E ratio	7.38●	155.96
Forward P/E	6.09	—
P/S ratio	1.69●	16.19
P/B ratio	1.24●	7.83
PEG ratio	0.31●	4.53
EV / EBITDA	4.06●	79.04
FCF yield	14.08%●	1.43%

Profitability

Metric	FIS	ONTO
Gross margin	37.59%	48.80%●
Operating margin	17.90%●	10.53%
Net margin	22.91%●	10.33%
ROE	16.72%●	4.99%
ROIC	3.49%	5.18%●

Dividends

Metric	FIS	ONTO
Dividend yield	4.40%	—
Payout ratio	227.03%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FIS	ONTO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.69%	11.93%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	23.73%	34.40%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-5.92%	11.03%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.32%	37.24%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, FIS or ONTO?: It depends on your goal. value: FIS (lower P/E); growth: ONTO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ONTO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FIS leads 9 to 6.
Is FIS or ONTO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FIS is cheaper: FIS trades at a 7.38 P/E and ONTO at 155.96.
Which has grown faster, FIS or ONTO?: Over the past five years, ONTO grew revenue faster — FIS at a -1.69% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.93%.
Does FIS or ONTO pay a bigger dividend?: FIS pays a dividend (4.40% yield) while ONTO does not currently pay one.
Is FIS or ONTO more profitable?: FIS runs the higher net margin — FIS at 22.91% versus ONTO at 10.33%.
Which has been the better investment, FIS or ONTO?: Over the past 10-year, ONTO delivered the higher annualized total return — FIS at -4.48% versus ONTO at 33.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FIS analysis Full ONTO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fidelity National Information Services P/E ratio Onto Innovation P/E ratio Fidelity National Information Services dividend yield Onto Innovation dividend yield Fidelity National Information Services ROE Onto Innovation ROE Fidelity National Information Services operating margin Onto Innovation operating margin Fidelity National Information Services revenue growth Onto Innovation revenue growth Fidelity National Information Services free cash flow Onto Innovation free cash flow

Fidelity National Information Services & Onto Innovation appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.