Is FIS or HPQ cheaper?

On trailing earnings, FIS is cheaper: FIS trades at a 7.57 P/E and HPQ at 9.31.

Which has grown faster, FIS or HPQ?

Over the past five years, HPQ grew revenue faster — FIS at a -1.69% CAGR versus HPQ at -1.23%.

Does FIS or HPQ pay a bigger dividend?

FIS yields 4.29% and HPQ yields 4.71% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FIS or HPQ more profitable?

FIS runs the higher net margin — FIS at 22.91% versus HPQ at 4.45%.

Which has been the better investment, FIS or HPQ?

Over the past 10-year, HPQ delivered the higher annualized total return — FIS at -4.41% versus HPQ at 10.22%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) vs HP Inc. (HPQ)

FIS leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and HP Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

FIS

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Total return — FIS vs HPQ

growth of $100 · last 25y

FIS +200.2%HPQ +113.9%FIS compounded faster

FIS HPQ

FIS vs HPQ: by the numbers

•HPQ is the larger company ($23.08B vs $20.26B market cap).
•FIS trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.57 vs 9.31 P/E).
•FIS converts more revenue to profit (22.91% vs 4.45% net margin).
•HPQ grew revenue faster over the past five years (-1.23% vs -1.69% CAGR).
•HPQ pays the higher dividend yield (4.71% vs 4.29%).

Which is better, FIS or HPQ?

Metric tally: FIS 10 · HPQ 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFIS(lower P/E)

GrowthHPQ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeHPQ(higher dividend yield)

QualityHPQ(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	FIS	HPQ
P/E ratio	7.57●	9.31
Forward P/E	6.24●	8.35
P/S ratio	1.74	0.41●
P/B ratio	1.27	—
PEG ratio	0.32●	1.59
EV / EBITDA	4.15●	7.48
FCF yield	13.72%	16.18%●

Profitability

Metric	FIS	HPQ
Gross margin	37.59%●	20.21%
Operating margin	17.90%●	5.51%
Net margin	22.91%●	4.45%
ROE	16.72%●	-730.92%
ROIC	3.49%	24.97%●

Dividends

Metric	FIS	HPQ
Dividend yield	4.29%	4.71%●
Payout ratio	227.03%	44.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FIS	HPQ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.69%	-1.23%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	23.73%●	5.84%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-5.92%●	-7.31%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.11%	0.21%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, FIS or HPQ?: It depends on your goal. value: FIS (lower P/E); growth: HPQ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: HPQ (higher dividend yield); quality: HPQ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FIS leads 10 to 6.
Is FIS or HPQ cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FIS is cheaper: FIS trades at a 7.57 P/E and HPQ at 9.31.
Which has grown faster, FIS or HPQ?: Over the past five years, HPQ grew revenue faster — FIS at a -1.69% CAGR versus HPQ at -1.23%.
Does FIS or HPQ pay a bigger dividend?: FIS yields 4.29% and HPQ yields 4.71% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FIS or HPQ more profitable?: FIS runs the higher net margin — FIS at 22.91% versus HPQ at 4.45%.
Which has been the better investment, FIS or HPQ?: Over the past 10-year, HPQ delivered the higher annualized total return — FIS at -4.41% versus HPQ at 10.22%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FIS analysis Full HPQ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fidelity National Information Services P/E ratio HP P/E ratio Fidelity National Information Services dividend yield HP dividend yield Fidelity National Information Services ROE HP ROE Fidelity National Information Services operating margin HP operating margin Fidelity National Information Services revenue growth HP revenue growth Fidelity National Information Services free cash flow HP free cash flow

Fidelity National Information Services & HP appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.