Is FIS or FN cheaper?

On trailing earnings, FIS is cheaper: FIS trades at a 7.57 P/E and FN at 52.49.

Which has grown faster, FIS or FN?

Over the past five years, FN grew revenue faster — FIS at a -1.69% CAGR versus FN at 18.99%.

Does FIS or FN pay a bigger dividend?

FIS pays a dividend (4.29% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.

Is FIS or FN more profitable?

FIS runs the higher net margin — FIS at 22.91% versus FN at 9.87%.

Which has been the better investment, FIS or FN?

Over the past 10-year, FN delivered the higher annualized total return — FIS at -4.41% versus FN at 32.51%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) vs Fabrinet (FN)

FIS leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Fabrinet across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

FIS

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Total return — FIS vs FN

growth of $100 · last 16y

FIS +42.3%FN +5583.8%FN compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FIS FN

FIS vs FN: by the numbers

•FN is the larger company ($21.89B vs $20.26B market cap).
•FIS trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.57 vs 52.49 P/E).
•FIS converts more revenue to profit (22.91% vs 9.87% net margin).
•FN grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.99% vs -1.69% CAGR).
•FIS pays a dividend (4.29% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.

Which is better, FIS or FN?

Metric tally: FIS 11 · FN 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFIS(lower P/E)

GrowthFN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityFN(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	FIS	FN
P/E ratio	7.57●	52.49
Forward P/E	6.24●	44.26
P/S ratio	1.74●	5.23
P/B ratio	1.27●	9.60
PEG ratio	0.32●	2.47
EV / EBITDA	4.15●	42.67
FCF yield	13.72%●	0.21%

Profitability

Metric	FIS	FN
Gross margin	37.59%●	11.96%
Operating margin	17.90%●	9.78%
Net margin	22.91%●	9.87%
ROE	16.72%	18.14%●
ROIC	3.49%	15.01%●

Dividends

Metric	FIS	FN
Dividend yield	4.29%	—
Payout ratio	227.03%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FIS	FN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.69%	18.99%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	23.73%	24.62%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-5.92%●	-9.50%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.11%	45.36%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, FIS or FN?: It depends on your goal. value: FIS (lower P/E); growth: FN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FIS leads 11 to 5.
Is FIS or FN cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FIS is cheaper: FIS trades at a 7.57 P/E and FN at 52.49.
Which has grown faster, FIS or FN?: Over the past five years, FN grew revenue faster — FIS at a -1.69% CAGR versus FN at 18.99%.
Does FIS or FN pay a bigger dividend?: FIS pays a dividend (4.29% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.
Is FIS or FN more profitable?: FIS runs the higher net margin — FIS at 22.91% versus FN at 9.87%.
Which has been the better investment, FIS or FN?: Over the past 10-year, FN delivered the higher annualized total return — FIS at -4.41% versus FN at 32.51%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FIS analysis Full FN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fidelity National Information Services P/E ratio Fabrinet P/E ratio Fidelity National Information Services dividend yield Fabrinet dividend yield Fidelity National Information Services ROE Fabrinet ROE Fidelity National Information Services operating margin Fabrinet operating margin Fidelity National Information Services revenue growth Fabrinet revenue growth Fidelity National Information Services free cash flow Fabrinet free cash flow

Fidelity National Information Services & Fabrinet appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.