Which has the lower trailing P/E, FICO or ZM?

ZM has the lower trailing P/E: FICO trades at 39.66 and ZM at 13.58. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FICO or ZM?

Over the past five years, FICO grew revenue faster — FICO at a 12.03% CAGR versus ZM at 8.51%.

Is FICO or ZM more profitable?

ZM runs the higher net margin — FICO at 34.05% versus ZM at 41.99%.

How have FICO and ZM total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, FICO delivered 26.93% and ZM delivered -24.57% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) vs Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM)

A side-by-side comparison of Fair Isaac Corporation and Zoom Communications, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FICO

Fair Isaac Corporation

$26.43B

$1,139.54TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Zoom Communications, Inc.

$27.07B

$92.32TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 30, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FICO vs ZM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

FICO +397.9%ZM +49.0%FICO compounded faster

FICO ZM

FICO vs ZM: by the numbers

•ZM is the larger company ($27.07B vs $26.43B market cap).
•ZM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.58 vs 39.66 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ZM converts more revenue to profit (41.99% vs 34.05% net margin).
•FICO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.03% vs 8.51% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FICO	ZM
P/E ratio	39.66	13.58
Forward P/E	31.87	15.47
P/S ratio	13.02	5.62
P/B ratio	N/A	2.78
PEG ratio	1.89	0.16
EV / EBITDA	29.26	20.06
FCF yield	3.19%	7.07%

Profitability

Metric	FICO	ZM
Gross margin	85.10%	77.40%
Operating margin	51.65%	24.17%
Net margin	34.05%	41.99%
ROE	-37.34%	20.77%
ROIC	52.96%	8.82%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FICO	ZM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	12.03%	8.51%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	27.04%	21.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.63%	4.31%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	21.08%	-24.57%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FICO or ZM?: ZM has the lower trailing P/E: FICO trades at 39.66 and ZM at 13.58. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FICO or ZM?: Over the past five years, FICO grew revenue faster — FICO at a 12.03% CAGR versus ZM at 8.51%.
Is FICO or ZM more profitable?: ZM runs the higher net margin — FICO at 34.05% versus ZM at 41.99%.
How have FICO and ZM total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, FICO delivered 26.93% and ZM delivered -24.57% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FICO analysis Full ZM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fair Isaac P/E ratio Zoom Communications P/E ratio Fair Isaac dividend yield Zoom Communications dividend yield Fair Isaac ROE Zoom Communications ROE Fair Isaac operating margin Zoom Communications operating margin Fair Isaac revenue growth Zoom Communications revenue growth Fair Isaac free cash flow Zoom Communications free cash flow

Fair Isaac & Zoom Communications appear in these rankings

Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.