Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) vs GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS)
FICO leads on 7 of 12 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Fair Isaac Corporation and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
$1263.83TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
$56.81TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — FICO vs GFS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5yFICO +208.2%GFS +22.6%FICO compounded faster
FICO GFS
FICO vs GFS: by the numbers
- •GFS is the larger company ($31.17B vs $29.31B market cap).
- •FICO trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.03 vs 40.87 P/E).
- •FICO converts more revenue to profit (33.67% vs 11.37% net margin).
- •FICO grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.12% vs 6.81% CAGR).
- •GFS pays a dividend (0.21% yield) while FICO does not currently pay one.
Which is better, FICO or GFS?
Metric tally: FICO 7 · GFS 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFICO(lower P/E)
GrowthFICO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityFICO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FICO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.03● | 40.87 |
| Forward P/E | 29.38● | 30.00 |
| P/S ratio | 13.30 | 4.66● |
| P/B ratio | — | 2.73 |
| PEG ratio | 1.89 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.03 | 15.03● |
| FCF yield | 2.97% | 3.37%● |
Profitability
| Metric | FICO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 84.16%● | 26.40% |
| Operating margin | 50.37%● | 12.08% |
| Net margin | 33.67%● | 11.37% |
| ROE | -37.34% | 6.65%● |
| ROIC | 52.96%● | 5.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | FICO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.21% |
| Payout ratio | — | 7.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FICO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.12%● | 6.81% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.04% | — |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.11% | 45.78%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.84% | — |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FICO or GFS?
- It depends on your goal. value: FICO (lower P/E); growth: FICO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FICO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FICO leads 7 to 5.
- Is FICO or GFS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FICO is cheaper: FICO trades at a 40.03 P/E and GFS at 40.87.
- Which has grown faster, FICO or GFS?
- Over the past five years, FICO grew revenue faster — FICO at a 11.12% CAGR versus GFS at 6.81%.
- Does FICO or GFS pay a bigger dividend?
- GFS pays a dividend (0.21% yield) while FICO does not currently pay one.
- Is FICO or GFS more profitable?
- FICO runs the higher net margin — FICO at 33.67% versus GFS at 11.37%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fair Isaac P/E ratioGLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratioFair Isaac dividend yieldGLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yieldFair Isaac ROEGLOBALFOUNDRIES ROEFair Isaac operating marginGLOBALFOUNDRIES operating marginFair Isaac revenue growthGLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growthFair Isaac free cash flowGLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow
Fair Isaac & GLOBALFOUNDRIES appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.