Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) vs GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS)
A side-by-side comparison of Fair Isaac Corporation and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
$1,118.93TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
$44.53TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — FICO vs GFS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5yFICO +168.1% (+21.8%/yr)GFS -5.1% (-1.0%/yr)FICO compounded faster over this window
FICO GFS
FICO vs GFS: by the numbers
- •GFS is the larger company ($24.43B vs $24.17B market cap).
- •FICO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (31.76 vs 34.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •FICO converts more revenue to profit (34.05% vs 10.32% net margin).
- •FICO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.03% vs 5.97% CAGR).
- •GFS pays a dividend (0.27% yield), while FICO is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FICO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 31.76 | 34.35 |
| Forward P/E | 25.61 | 22.72 |
| P/S ratio | 10.43 | 3.52 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 2.07 |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.20 | 12.07 |
| FCF yield | 3.99% | 3.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | FICO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 85.10% | 27.43% |
| Operating margin | 51.65% | 11.59% |
| Net margin | 34.05% | 10.32% |
| ROE | -37.34% | 6.06% |
| ROIC | 59.42% | 4.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | FICO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.27% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 7.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FICO | GFS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.03% | 5.97% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.04% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 16.63% | 35.25% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.43% | N/A |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, FICO or GFS?
- FICO has the lower trailing P/E: FICO trades at 31.76 and GFS at 34.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, FICO or GFS?
- Over the past five years, FICO grew revenue faster — FICO at a 12.03% CAGR versus GFS at 5.97%.
- Does FICO or GFS pay a bigger dividend?
- GFS pays a dividend (0.27% yield), while FICO is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is FICO or GFS more profitable?
- FICO runs the higher net margin — FICO at 34.05% versus GFS at 10.32%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fair Isaac P/E ratioGLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratioGLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yieldFair Isaac ROEGLOBALFOUNDRIES ROEFair Isaac operating marginGLOBALFOUNDRIES operating marginFair Isaac revenue growthGLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growthFair Isaac free cash flowGLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow
Fair Isaac & GLOBALFOUNDRIES appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.