Fiserv, Inc. (FI) vs Jabil Inc. (JBL)
FI leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Fiserv, Inc. and Jabil Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — FI vs JBL
growth of $100 · last 29yFI +2721.0%JBL +14570.7%JBL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FI JBL
FI vs JBL: by the numbers
- •JBL is the larger company ($37.79B vs $34.31B market cap).
- •FI trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.16 vs 44.77 P/E).
- •FI converts more revenue to profit (15.17% vs 2.57% net margin).
- •FI grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.29% vs 2.86% CAGR).
- •JBL pays a dividend (0.09% yield) while FI does not currently pay one.
Which is better, FI or JBL?
Metric tally: FI 8 · JBL 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFI(lower P/E)
GrowthFI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityJBL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FI | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 10.16● | 44.77 |
| Forward P/E | 7.69● | 28.11 |
| P/S ratio | 1.68 | 1.14● |
| P/B ratio | 1.42● | 28.87 |
| PEG ratio | 0.60 | 0.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.13● | 20.85 |
| FCF yield | 16.67%● | 3.94% |
Profitability
| Metric | FI | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.00% | 9.23%● |
| Operating margin | 25.32%● | 4.32% |
| Net margin | 15.17%● | 2.57% |
| ROE | 12.20% | 65.15%● |
| ROIC | 10.12% | 16.06%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FI | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.09% |
| Payout ratio | — | 5.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FI | JBL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.29%● | 2.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 34.70% | 75.55%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.82% | 59.60%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -11.04% | 44.67%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FI or JBL?
- It depends on your goal. value: FI (lower P/E); growth: FI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: JBL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FI leads 8 to 7.
- Is FI or JBL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FI is cheaper: FI trades at a 10.16 P/E and JBL at 44.77.
- Which has grown faster, FI or JBL?
- Over the past five years, FI grew revenue faster — FI at a 7.29% CAGR versus JBL at 2.86%.
- Does FI or JBL pay a bigger dividend?
- JBL pays a dividend (0.09% yield) while FI does not currently pay one.
- Is FI or JBL more profitable?
- FI runs the higher net margin — FI at 15.17% versus JBL at 2.57%.
- Which has been the better investment, FI or JBL?
- Over the past 10-year, JBL delivered the higher annualized total return — FI at 3.34% versus JBL at 35.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fiserv P/E ratioJabil P/E ratioFiserv dividend yieldJabil dividend yieldFiserv ROEJabil ROEFiserv operating marginJabil operating marginFiserv revenue growthJabil revenue growthFiserv free cash flowJabil free cash flow
Fiserv & Jabil appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.