Which has the lower trailing P/E, FERG or TRI?

FERG has the lower trailing P/E: FERG trades at 22.32 and TRI at 28.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FERG or TRI?

Over the past five years, TRI grew revenue faster — FERG at a -17.70% CAGR versus TRI at 4.88%.

Does FERG or TRI pay a bigger dividend?

FERG yields 1.88% and TRI yields 3.77% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FERG or TRI more profitable?

TRI runs the higher net margin — FERG at 6.39% versus TRI at 21.22%.

How have FERG and TRI total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FERG delivered 17.93% and TRI delivered 10.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ferguson plc (FERG) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)

A side-by-side comparison of Ferguson plc and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FERG

Ferguson plc

$45.24B

$233.26IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TRI

Thomson Reuters Corporation

$45.74B

$104.78IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 27, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — FERG vs TRI

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FERG +404.4% (+17.6%/yr)TRI +168.4% (+10.4%/yr)FERG compounded faster over this window

FERG TRI

FERG vs TRI: by the numbers

•TRI is the larger company ($45.74B vs $45.24B market cap).
•FERG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.32 vs 28.02 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•TRI converts more revenue to profit (21.22% vs 6.39% net margin).
•TRI grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.88% vs -17.70% CAGR).
•TRI pays the higher dividend yield (3.77% vs 1.88%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FERG	TRI
P/E ratio	22.32	28.02
Forward P/E	20.52	23.38
P/S ratio	1.42	5.87
P/B ratio	7.30	4.14
EV / EBITDA	15.73	15.48
FCF yield	2.79%	4.82%

Profitability

Metric	FERG	TRI
Gross margin	30.55%	75.80%
Operating margin	9.01%	27.64%
Net margin	6.39%	21.22%
ROE	32.88%	14.96%
ROIC	16.51%	11.04%

Dividends

Metric	FERG	TRI
Dividend yield	1.88%	3.77%
Payout ratio	127.62%	116.05%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FERG	TRI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-17.70%	4.88%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.59%	7.22%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-15.02%	9.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.90%	-1.02%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FERG or TRI?: FERG has the lower trailing P/E: FERG trades at 22.32 and TRI at 28.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FERG or TRI?: Over the past five years, TRI grew revenue faster — FERG at a -17.70% CAGR versus TRI at 4.88%.
Does FERG or TRI pay a bigger dividend?: FERG yields 1.88% and TRI yields 3.77% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FERG or TRI more profitable?: TRI runs the higher net margin — FERG at 6.39% versus TRI at 21.22%.
How have FERG and TRI total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FERG delivered 17.93% and TRI delivered 10.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FERG analysis Full TRI analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ferguson P/E ratio Thomson Reuters P/E ratio Ferguson dividend yield Thomson Reuters dividend yield Ferguson ROE Thomson Reuters ROE Ferguson operating margin Thomson Reuters operating margin Ferguson revenue growth Thomson Reuters revenue growth Ferguson free cash flow Thomson Reuters free cash flow

Ferguson & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.