Ferrovial SE (FER) vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB)
A side-by-side comparison of Ferrovial SE and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
FER
Ferrovial SE
$58.10IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
$280.83IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:02 PM EDT
Total return — FER vs WAB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yFER +226.4% (+12.6%/yr)WAB +283.6% (+14.4%/yr)WAB compounded faster over this window
FER WAB
FER vs WAB: by the numbers
- •WAB is the larger company ($47.44B vs $42.14B market cap).
- •WAB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (37.61 vs 45.18 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •WAB converts more revenue to profit (10.59% vs 6.73% net margin).
- •WAB grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.16% vs 7.22% CAGR).
- •FER pays the higher dividend yield (2.23% vs 0.42%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FER | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.18 | 37.61 |
| Forward P/E | 58.43 | 25.76 |
| P/S ratio | 2.47 | 3.97 |
| P/B ratio | 6.38 | 4.23 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.45 | 21.66 |
| FCF yield | 8.40% | 3.89% |
Profitability
| Metric | FER | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 24.87% | 34.33% |
| Operating margin | 10.04% | 16.54% |
| Net margin | 6.73% | 10.59% |
| ROE | 17.37% | 11.29% |
| ROIC | 6.80% | 7.64% |
Dividends
| Metric | FER | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.23% | 0.42% |
| Payout ratio | 88.69% | 17.20% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FER | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.22% | 9.16% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 25.63% | 25.77% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.48% | 14.38% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.59% | 25.99% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, FER or WAB?
- WAB has the lower trailing P/E: FER trades at 45.18 and WAB at 37.61. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, FER or WAB?
- Over the past five years, WAB grew revenue faster — FER at a 7.22% CAGR versus WAB at 9.16%.
- Does FER or WAB pay a bigger dividend?
- FER yields 2.23% and WAB yields 0.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FER or WAB more profitable?
- WAB runs the higher net margin — FER at 6.73% versus WAB at 10.59%.
- How have FER and WAB total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, FER delivered 13.17% and WAB delivered 14.48% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ferrovial SE P/E ratioWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies P/E ratioFerrovial SE dividend yieldWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies dividend yieldFerrovial SE ROEWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies ROEFerrovial SE operating marginWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies operating marginFerrovial SE revenue growthWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies revenue growthFerrovial SE free cash flowWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies free cash flow
Ferrovial SE & Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.