Ferrovial SE (FER) vs Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB)
WAB leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Ferrovial SE and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FER
Ferrovial SE
$63.91IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
$259.18IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT
Total return — FER vs WAB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yFER +695.7%WAB +606.0%FER compounded faster
FER WAB
FER vs WAB: by the numbers
- •FER is the larger company ($46.06B vs $43.98B market cap).
- •WAB trades at the lower earnings multiple (37.06 vs 60.21 P/E).
- •WAB converts more revenue to profit (10.52% vs 8.85% net margin).
- •WAB grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.07% vs 8.70% CAGR).
- •FER pays the higher dividend yield (2.03% vs 0.43%).
Which is better, FER or WAB?
Metric tally: FER 4 · WAB 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWAB(lower P/E)
GrowthWAB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeFER(higher dividend yield)
QualityWAB(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FER | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 60.21 | 37.06● |
| Forward P/E | 64.89 | 24.68● |
| P/S ratio | 4.06 | 3.89● |
| P/B ratio | 6.61 | 4.01● |
| PEG ratio | 4.82 | 2.32● |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.35 | 21.93● |
| FCF yield | 3.25% | 3.67%● |
Profitability
| Metric | FER | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 93.70%● | 33.81% |
| Operating margin | 10.36% | 16.10%● |
| Net margin | 8.85% | 10.52%● |
| ROE | 14.38%● | 10.85% |
| ROIC | 5.32% | 7.64%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FER | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.03%● | 0.43% |
| Payout ratio | 91.65% | 16.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FER | WAB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.70% | 9.07%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.48% | 25.77%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.35%● | 9.83% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.57% | 26.72%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FER or WAB?
- It depends on your goal. value: WAB (lower P/E); growth: WAB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FER (higher dividend yield); quality: WAB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WAB leads 13 to 4.
- Is FER or WAB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WAB is cheaper: FER trades at a 60.21 P/E and WAB at 37.06.
- Which has grown faster, FER or WAB?
- Over the past five years, WAB grew revenue faster — FER at a 8.70% CAGR versus WAB at 9.07%.
- Does FER or WAB pay a bigger dividend?
- FER yields 2.03% and WAB yields 0.43% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FER or WAB more profitable?
- WAB runs the higher net margin — FER at 8.85% versus WAB at 10.52%.
- Which has been the better investment, FER or WAB?
- Over the past 10-year, WAB delivered the higher annualized total return — FER at 14.02% versus WAB at 14.54%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ferrovial SE P/E ratioWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies P/E ratioFerrovial SE dividend yieldWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies dividend yieldFerrovial SE ROEWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies ROEFerrovial SE operating marginWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies operating marginFerrovial SE revenue growthWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies revenue growthFerrovial SE free cash flowWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies free cash flow
Ferrovial SE & Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 15, 2026.