Ferrovial SE (FER) vs L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX)
FER leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics, though LHX is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Ferrovial SE and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FER
Ferrovial SE
$63.45IndustrialsAt close: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
$280.55IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — FER vs LHX
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yFER +692.3%LHX +770.9%LHX compounded faster
FER LHX
FER vs LHX: by the numbers
- •LHX is the larger company ($52.27B vs $45.72B market cap).
- •LHX trades at the lower earnings multiple (30.46 vs 59.95 P/E).
- •FER converts more revenue to profit (8.85% vs 7.71% net margin).
- •FER grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.70% vs 4.38% CAGR).
- •FER pays the higher dividend yield (2.04% vs 1.75%).
Which is better, FER or LHX?
Metric tally: FER 10 · LHX 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLHX(lower P/E)
GrowthFER(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeFER(higher dividend yield)
QualityFER(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FER | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 59.95 | 30.46● |
| Forward P/E | 64.55 | 26.35● |
| P/S ratio | 4.04 | 2.35● |
| P/B ratio | 6.58 | 2.68● |
| PEG ratio | 4.80 | 4.26● |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.21 | 18.49● |
| FCF yield | 3.26% | 4.90%● |
Profitability
| Metric | FER | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 93.70%● | 25.26% |
| Operating margin | 10.36%● | 9.93% |
| Net margin | 8.85%● | 7.71% |
| ROE | 14.38%● | 8.80% |
| ROIC | 5.32%● | 5.14% |
Dividends
| Metric | FER | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.04%● | 1.75% |
| Payout ratio | 91.65% | 57.18% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FER | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.70%● | 4.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.48%● | -1.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.35%● | 0.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.47%● | 6.56% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FER or LHX?
- It depends on your goal. value: LHX (lower P/E); growth: FER (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FER (higher dividend yield); quality: FER (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FER leads 10 to 7.
- Is FER or LHX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LHX is cheaper: FER trades at a 59.95 P/E and LHX at 30.46.
- Which has grown faster, FER or LHX?
- Over the past five years, FER grew revenue faster — FER at a 8.70% CAGR versus LHX at 4.38%.
- Does FER or LHX pay a bigger dividend?
- FER yields 2.04% and LHX yields 1.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FER or LHX more profitable?
- FER runs the higher net margin — FER at 8.85% versus LHX at 7.71%.
- Which has been the better investment, FER or LHX?
- Over the past 10-year, LHX delivered the higher annualized total return — FER at 14.15% versus LHX at 14.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ferrovial SE P/E ratioL3Harris Technologies P/E ratioFerrovial SE dividend yieldL3Harris Technologies dividend yieldFerrovial SE ROEL3Harris Technologies ROEFerrovial SE operating marginL3Harris Technologies operating marginFerrovial SE revenue growthL3Harris Technologies revenue growthFerrovial SE free cash flowL3Harris Technologies free cash flow
Ferrovial SE & L3Harris Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 21, 2026.