5E Advanced Materials Inc. (FEAM) vs Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID)

A side-by-side comparison of 5E Advanced Materials Inc. and Smith-Midland Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — FEAM vs SMID

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y
FEAM -99.5% (-65.1%/yr)SMID -2.1% (-0.4%/yr)SMID compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
01101001kStart $1002023202420252026$1$98
FEAM SMID

FEAM vs SMID: by the numbers

  • •FEAM is the larger company ($168M vs $118M market cap).
  • •SMID is profitable (8.63% net margin) while FEAM runs a net loss (0.00%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricFEAMSMID
P/E ratioN/A15.27
PEG ratioN/A0.43
P/S ratioN/A1.32
P/B ratio2.612.07
EV / EBITDAN/A7.78
FCF yieldN/A3.52%

Profitability

MetricFEAMSMID
Gross margin0.00%23.46%
Operating margin0.00%12.07%
Net margin0.00%8.63%
ROE-66.95%13.55%
ROIC-63.94%10.19%

Growth (annualized)

MetricFEAMSMID
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A11.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A35.86%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A0.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A7.87%

Frequently asked

Is FEAM or SMID more profitable?
SMID runs the higher net margin — FEAM at 0.00% versus SMID at 8.63%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.