Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

Over the past 10 years, WULF lagged FDVV — 5.62% vs 12.99% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

A side-by-side comparison of Fidelity High Dividend ETF and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — FDVV vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
FDVV +240.6% (+13.0%/yr)WULF +72.9% (+5.6%/yr)FDVV compounded faster over this window
0100200300400Start $10020182020202220242026$341$173
FDVV WULF

Metrics side by side

Did WULF beat FDVV?

Over the past 10 years, WULF lagged FDVV — 5.62% vs 12.99% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Total return (annualized)

MetricFDVVWULF
Total return (1Y)11.35%30.01%
Total return CAGR (3Y)19.87%127.49%
Total return CAGR (5Y)13.76%-8.25%
Total return CAGR (10Y)12.99%5.62%

FDVV is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).

Frequently asked

Has WULF beaten FDVV?
Over the past 10 years, WULF lagged FDVV — 5.62% vs 12.99% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.