Which has grown faster, FDS or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — FDS at a 9.30% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.

Does FDS or WULF pay a bigger dividend?

FDS pays a dividend (1.49% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is FDS or WULF more profitable?

FDS runs the higher net margin — FDS at 23.21% versus WULF at -1179.94%.

How have FDS and WULF total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FDS delivered 6.66% and WULF delivered 4.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

A side-by-side comparison of FactSet Research Systems Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FDS

FactSet Research Systems Inc.

$10.67B

$299.91Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

WULF

TeraWulf Inc.

$7.75B

$15.64Financial ServicesAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — FDS vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FDS +90.5% (+6.7%/yr)WULF +75.3% (+5.8%/yr)FDS compounded faster over this window

FDS WULF

FDS vs WULF: by the numbers

•FDS is the larger company ($10.67B vs $7.75B market cap).
•FDS is profitable (23.21% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-1179.94%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (73.75% vs 9.30% CAGR).
•FDS pays a dividend (1.49% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FDS	WULF
P/E ratio	19.74	N/A
Forward P/E	16.86	N/A
P/S ratio	4.55	45.99
P/B ratio	5.45	51.58

Profitability

Metric	FDS	WULF
Gross margin	51.38%	50.93%
Operating margin	29.55%	-101.10%
Net margin	23.21%	-1179.94%
ROE	27.85%	-1323.42%

Dividends

Metric	FDS	WULF
Dividend yield	1.49%	N/A
Payout ratio	28.34%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FDS	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.30%	73.75%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.87%	-27.04%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-3.06%	-3.68%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, FDS or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — FDS at a 9.30% CAGR versus WULF at 73.75%.
Does FDS or WULF pay a bigger dividend?: FDS pays a dividend (1.49% yield), while WULF is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is FDS or WULF more profitable?: FDS runs the higher net margin — FDS at 23.21% versus WULF at -1179.94%.
How have FDS and WULF total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FDS delivered 6.66% and WULF delivered 4.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FDS analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

FactSet Research Systems P/E ratio FactSet Research Systems dividend yield FactSet Research Systems ROE TeraWulf ROE FactSet Research Systems operating margin TeraWulf operating margin FactSet Research Systems revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth

FactSet Research Systems & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.