Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)
FCX leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics, though SHW is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. and The Sherwin-Williams Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
$68.41Basic Materials
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$317.30Basic Materials
Total return — FCX vs SHW
growth of $100 · last 30yFCX +343.1%SHW +4300.8%SHW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FCX SHW
FCX vs SHW: by the numbers
- •FCX is the larger company ($98.34B vs $78.26B market cap).
- •SHW trades at the lower earnings multiple (30.45 vs 36.20 P/E).
- •SHW converts more revenue to profit (10.86% vs 10.34% net margin).
- •FCX grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.28% vs 4.87% CAGR).
- •SHW pays the higher dividend yield (1.00% vs 0.88%).
Which is better, FCX or SHW?
Metric tally: FCX 10 · SHW 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSHW(lower P/E)
GrowthFCX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSHW(higher dividend yield)
QualitySHW(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | FCX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.20 | 30.45● |
| Forward P/E | 17.76● | 27.07 |
| P/S ratio | 3.74 | 3.29● |
| P/B ratio | 5.06● | 17.77 |
| PEG ratio | 1.98● | 4.52 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.96● | 20.64 |
| FCF yield | 6.32%● | 3.69% |
Profitability
| Metric | FCX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 27.80% | 49.12%● |
| Operating margin | 27.77%● | 16.13% |
| Net margin | 10.34% | 10.86%● |
| ROE | 14.01% | 58.66%● |
| ROIC | 7.77% | 15.21%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FCX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 1.00%● |
| Payout ratio | 39.22% | 30.64% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FCX | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.28%● | 4.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 30.14%● | 6.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.99%● | -2.44% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.39%● | 3.70% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FCX or SHW?
- It depends on your goal. value: SHW (lower P/E); growth: FCX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SHW (higher dividend yield); quality: SHW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FCX leads 10 to 7.
- Is FCX or SHW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SHW is cheaper: FCX trades at a 36.20 P/E and SHW at 30.45.
- Which has grown faster, FCX or SHW?
- Over the past five years, FCX grew revenue faster — FCX at a 11.28% CAGR versus SHW at 4.87%.
- Does FCX or SHW pay a bigger dividend?
- FCX yields 0.88% and SHW yields 1.00% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FCX or SHW more profitable?
- SHW runs the higher net margin — FCX at 10.34% versus SHW at 10.86%.
- Which has been the better investment, FCX or SHW?
- Over the past 10-year, FCX delivered the higher annualized total return — FCX at 22.00% versus SHW at 13.58%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Freeport-McMoRan P/E ratioSherwin-Williams P/E ratioFreeport-McMoRan dividend yieldSherwin-Williams dividend yieldFreeport-McMoRan ROESherwin-Williams ROEFreeport-McMoRan operating marginSherwin-Williams operating marginFreeport-McMoRan revenue growthSherwin-Williams revenue growthFreeport-McMoRan free cash flowSherwin-Williams free cash flow
Freeport-McMoRan & Sherwin-Williams appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.