Is FCX or RIO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, RIO is cheaper: FCX trades at a 33.04 P/E and RIO at 7.12.

Which has grown faster, FCX or RIO?

Over the past five years, FCX grew revenue faster — FCX at a 11.28% CAGR versus RIO at 4.92%.

Does FCX or RIO pay a bigger dividend?

FCX yields 0.96% and RIO yields 5.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FCX or RIO more profitable?

RIO runs the higher net margin — FCX at 10.34% versus RIO at 19.28%.

Which has been the better investment, FCX or RIO?

Over the past 10-year, RIO delivered the higher annualized total return — FCX at 20.64% versus RIO at 21.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) vs Rio Tinto Group (RIO)

RIO leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. and Rio Tinto Group across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

FCX

Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

$89.60B

$62.45Basic Materials

RIO

Rio Tinto Group

$152.24B

$93.74Basic Materials

Total return — FCX vs RIO

growth of $100 · last 30y

FCX +301.3%RIO +522.4%RIO compounded faster

FCX RIO

FCX vs RIO: by the numbers

•RIO is the larger company ($152.24B vs $89.60B market cap).
•RIO trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.12 vs 33.04 P/E).
•RIO converts more revenue to profit (19.28% vs 10.34% net margin).
•FCX grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.28% vs 4.92% CAGR).
•RIO pays the higher dividend yield (5.42% vs 0.96%).

Which is better, FCX or RIO?

Metric tally: FCX 6 · RIO 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueRIO(lower P/E)

GrowthFCX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRIO(higher dividend yield)

QualityRIO(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FCX	RIO
P/E ratio	33.04	7.12●
Forward P/E	15.79	10.76●
P/S ratio	3.41	1.38●
P/B ratio	4.62	2.47●
PEG ratio	1.98●	19.77
EV / EBITDA	10.03	4.06●
FCF yield	6.93%	7.01%

Profitability

Metric	FCX	RIO
Gross margin	27.80%	27.57%
Operating margin	27.77%●	27.10%
Net margin	10.34%	19.28%●
ROE	14.01%	34.53%●
ROIC	7.77%	9.18%●

Dividends

Metric	FCX	RIO
Dividend yield	0.96%	5.42%●
Payout ratio	39.22%	82.60%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FCX	RIO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.28%●	4.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	30.14%●	0.36%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	20.99%●	-11.74%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	12.43%●	10.24%

Frequently asked

Which is better, FCX or RIO?: It depends on your goal. value: RIO (lower P/E); growth: FCX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RIO (higher dividend yield); quality: RIO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RIO leads 9 to 6.
Is FCX or RIO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, RIO is cheaper: FCX trades at a 33.04 P/E and RIO at 7.12.
Which has grown faster, FCX or RIO?: Over the past five years, FCX grew revenue faster — FCX at a 11.28% CAGR versus RIO at 4.92%.
Does FCX or RIO pay a bigger dividend?: FCX yields 0.96% and RIO yields 5.42% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FCX or RIO more profitable?: RIO runs the higher net margin — FCX at 10.34% versus RIO at 19.28%.
Which has been the better investment, FCX or RIO?: Over the past 10-year, RIO delivered the higher annualized total return — FCX at 20.64% versus RIO at 21.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FCX analysis Full RIO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Freeport-McMoRan P/E ratio Rio Tinto P/E ratio Freeport-McMoRan dividend yield Rio Tinto dividend yield Freeport-McMoRan ROE Rio Tinto ROE Freeport-McMoRan operating margin Rio Tinto operating margin Freeport-McMoRan revenue growth Rio Tinto revenue growth Freeport-McMoRan free cash flow Rio Tinto free cash flow

Freeport-McMoRan & Rio Tinto appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.