FatPipe, Inc. (FATN) vs Usio, Inc. (USIO)
A side-by-side comparison of FatPipe, Inc. and Usio, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
FATN
FatPipe, Inc.
$5.24TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
USIO
Usio, Inc.
$2.83TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — FATN vs USIO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yFATN -57.8% (-57.8%/yr)USIO +120.5% (+120.5%/yr)USIO compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FATN USIO
FATN vs USIO: by the numbers
- •USIO is the larger company ($78M vs $73M market cap).
- •FATN is profitable (26.87% net margin) while USIO runs a net loss (-1.63%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FATN | USIO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.46 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 11.98 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 3.62 | 0.84 |
| P/B ratio | 2.77 | 4.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.64 | 199.94 |
Profitability
| Metric | FATN | USIO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 90.68% | 22.02% |
| Operating margin | 17.18% | -1.21% |
| Net margin | 26.87% | -1.63% |
| ROE | 20.57% | -8.03% |
| ROIC | 10.82% | -4.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FATN | USIO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 14.91% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -14.14% |
Frequently asked
- Is FATN or USIO more profitable?
- FATN runs the higher net margin — FATN at 26.87% versus USIO at -1.63%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
FatPipe P/E ratioFatPipe ROEUsio ROEFatPipe operating marginUsio operating marginFatPipe revenue growthUsio revenue growthFatPipe free cash flowUsio free cash flow
FatPipe & Usio appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.