Fastenal Company (FAST) vs W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW)
GWW leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Fastenal Company and W.W. Grainger, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — FAST vs GWW
growth of $100 · last 30yFAST +3565.6%GWW +3408.0%FAST compounded faster
FAST GWW
FAST vs GWW: by the numbers
- •GWW is the larger company ($64.91B vs $53.87B market cap).
- •GWW trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.96 vs 41.16 P/E).
- •FAST converts more revenue to profit (15.39% vs 9.70% net margin).
- •GWW grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.12% vs 8.19% CAGR).
- •FAST pays the higher dividend yield (1.96% vs 0.67%).
Which is better, FAST or GWW?
Metric tally: FAST 5 · GWW 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGWW(lower P/E)
GrowthGWW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeFAST(higher dividend yield)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FAST | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 41.16 | 36.96● |
| Forward P/E | 37.71 | 30.14● |
| P/S ratio | 6.40 | 3.55● |
| P/B ratio | 13.54● | 16.58 |
| PEG ratio | 3.65 | 1.66● |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.60 | 23.32● |
| FCF yield | 2.15% | 2.12% |
Profitability
| Metric | FAST | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.89%● | 39.15% |
| Operating margin | 20.25%● | 14.23% |
| Net margin | 15.39%● | 9.70% |
| ROE | 32.58% | 45.34%● |
| ROIC | 28.17% | 27.73% |
Dividends
| Metric | FAST | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.96%● | 0.67% |
| Payout ratio | 83.64% | 26.13% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FAST | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.19% | 9.12%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.96% | 22.25%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.42% | 7.67%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.37% | 26.72%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FAST or GWW?
- It depends on your goal. value: GWW (lower P/E); growth: GWW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FAST (higher dividend yield). Across all compared metrics, GWW leads 10 to 5.
- Is FAST or GWW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GWW is cheaper: FAST trades at a 41.16 P/E and GWW at 36.96.
- Which has grown faster, FAST or GWW?
- Over the past five years, GWW grew revenue faster — FAST at a 8.19% CAGR versus GWW at 9.12%.
- Does FAST or GWW pay a bigger dividend?
- FAST yields 1.96% and GWW yields 0.67% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FAST or GWW more profitable?
- FAST runs the higher net margin — FAST at 15.39% versus GWW at 9.70%.
- Which has been the better investment, FAST or GWW?
- Over the past 10-year, GWW delivered the higher annualized total return — FAST at 18.74% versus GWW at 22.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fastenal P/E ratioW.W. Grainger P/E ratioFastenal dividend yieldW.W. Grainger dividend yieldFastenal ROEW.W. Grainger ROEFastenal operating marginW.W. Grainger operating marginFastenal revenue growthW.W. Grainger revenue growthFastenal free cash flowW.W. Grainger free cash flow
Fastenal & W.W. Grainger appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.