Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) vs Suncor Energy Inc. (SU)
SU leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Suncor Energy Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — FANG vs SU
growth of $100 · last 14yFANG +928.1%SU +63.4%FANG compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FANG SU
FANG vs SU: by the numbers
- •SU is the larger company ($63.64B vs $50.61B market cap).
- •SU trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.13 vs 211.66 P/E).
- •SU converts more revenue to profit (12.16% vs 2.65% net margin).
- •FANG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.44% vs 13.46% CAGR).
- •SU pays the higher dividend yield (3.21% vs 2.45%).
Which is better, FANG or SU?
Metric tally: FANG 5 · SU 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSU(lower P/E)
GrowthFANG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSU(higher dividend yield)
QualitySU(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FANG | SU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 211.66 | 14.13● |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.42 |
| P/S ratio | 3.35 | 1.70● |
| P/B ratio | 1.39● | 1.95 |
| PEG ratio | 8.32 | 4.56● |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.51 | 4.61● |
| FCF yield | 3.13% | 8.17%● |
Profitability
| Metric | FANG | SU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 41.83% | 55.48%● |
| Operating margin | 32.73%● | 27.38% |
| Net margin | 2.65% | 12.16%● |
| ROE | 1.10% | 13.92%● |
| ROIC | 6.00% | 14.20%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FANG | SU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.45% | 3.21%● |
| Payout ratio | 76.79% | 48.92% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FANG | SU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.44%● | 13.46% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 25.44%● | 16.24% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 91.40%● | 82.96% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.00% | 22.01%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FANG or SU?
- It depends on your goal. value: SU (lower P/E); growth: FANG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SU (higher dividend yield); quality: SU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SU leads 11 to 5.
- Is FANG or SU cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SU is cheaper: FANG trades at a 211.66 P/E and SU at 14.13.
- Which has grown faster, FANG or SU?
- Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — FANG at a 37.44% CAGR versus SU at 13.46%.
- Does FANG or SU pay a bigger dividend?
- FANG yields 2.45% and SU yields 3.21% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FANG or SU more profitable?
- SU runs the higher net margin — FANG at 2.65% versus SU at 12.16%.
- Which has been the better investment, FANG or SU?
- Over the past 10-year, SU delivered the higher annualized total return — FANG at 10.32% versus SU at 11.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Diamondback Energy P/E ratioSuncor Energy P/E ratioDiamondback Energy dividend yieldSuncor Energy dividend yieldDiamondback Energy ROESuncor Energy ROEDiamondback Energy operating marginSuncor Energy operating marginDiamondback Energy revenue growthSuncor Energy revenue growthDiamondback Energy free cash flowSuncor Energy free cash flow
Diamondback Energy & Suncor Energy appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.