Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) vs Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (RCL)
A side-by-side comparison of Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: FANG is classified in Energy; RCL is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$190.31EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
RCL
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
$322.50Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — FANG vs RCL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yFANG +1364.5%RCL +999.0%FANG compounded faster
FANG RCL
FANG vs RCL: by the numbers
- •RCL is the larger company ($86.49B vs $53.54B market cap).
- •RCL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.61 vs 230.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •RCL converts more revenue to profit (23.56% vs 2.65% net margin).
- •RCL grew revenue faster over the past five years (188.60% vs 37.44% CAGR).
- •FANG pays the higher dividend yield (2.12% vs 1.64%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FANG | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 230.35 | 18.61 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 17.61 |
| P/S ratio | 3.64 | 4.50 |
| P/B ratio | 1.52 | 8.43 |
| PEG ratio | 9.05 | 0.41 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.03 | 15.31 |
| FCF yield | 2.88% | 1.66% |
Profitability
| Metric | FANG | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 41.83% | 46.64% |
| Operating margin | 32.73% | 27.32% |
| Net margin | 2.65% | 23.56% |
| ROE | 1.10% | 43.01% |
| ROIC | 6.00% | 14.90% |
Dividends
| Metric | FANG | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.12% | 1.64% |
| Payout ratio | 72.43% | 31.79% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FANG | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.44% | 188.60% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 25.44% | 9.81% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 91.40% | 11.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.27% | 32.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, FANG or RCL?
- RCL has the lower trailing P/E: FANG trades at 230.35 and RCL at 18.61. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, FANG or RCL?
- Over the past five years, RCL grew revenue faster — FANG at a 37.44% CAGR versus RCL at 188.60%.
- Does FANG or RCL pay a bigger dividend?
- FANG yields 2.12% and RCL yields 1.64% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FANG or RCL more profitable?
- RCL runs the higher net margin — FANG at 2.65% versus RCL at 23.56%.
- How have FANG and RCL total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, FANG delivered 11.62% and RCL delivered 17.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Diamondback Energy P/E ratioRoyal Caribbean Cruises P/E ratioDiamondback Energy dividend yieldRoyal Caribbean Cruises dividend yieldDiamondback Energy ROERoyal Caribbean Cruises ROEDiamondback Energy operating marginRoyal Caribbean Cruises operating marginDiamondback Energy revenue growthRoyal Caribbean Cruises revenue growthDiamondback Energy free cash flowRoyal Caribbean Cruises free cash flow
Diamondback Energy & Royal Caribbean Cruises appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.