Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) vs Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI)
FANG and KMI are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Kinder Morgan, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$195.38EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
KMI
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
$32.58EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — FANG vs KMI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yFANG +1374.1%KMI +82.7%FANG compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FANG KMI
FANG vs KMI: by the numbers
- •KMI is the larger company ($72.48B vs $54.96B market cap).
- •KMI trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.87 vs 230.05 P/E).
- •KMI converts more revenue to profit (18.92% vs 2.65% net margin).
- •FANG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.44% vs 4.10% CAGR).
- •KMI pays the higher dividend yield (3.61% vs 2.12%).
Which is better, FANG or KMI?
Metric tally: FANG 8 · KMI 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKMI(lower P/E)
GrowthFANG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKMI(higher dividend yield)
QualityFANG(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FANG | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 230.05 | 21.87● |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.14 |
| P/S ratio | 3.64● | 4.14 |
| P/B ratio | 1.52● | 2.31 |
| PEG ratio | 9.04 | 1.17● |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.02● | 13.95 |
| FCF yield | 2.88% | 5.37%● |
Profitability
| Metric | FANG | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 41.83% | 46.95%● |
| Operating margin | 32.73%● | 28.61% |
| Net margin | 2.65% | 18.92%● |
| ROE | 1.10% | 10.58%● |
| ROIC | 6.00%● | 5.33% |
Dividends
| Metric | FANG | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.12% | 3.61%● |
| Payout ratio | 72.43% | 85.77% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FANG | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.44%● | 4.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 25.44% | 96.49%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 91.40%● | 2.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 26.63%● | 19.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FANG or KMI?
- It depends on your goal. value: KMI (lower P/E); growth: FANG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMI (higher dividend yield); quality: FANG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is FANG or KMI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KMI is cheaper: FANG trades at a 230.05 P/E and KMI at 21.87.
- Which has grown faster, FANG or KMI?
- Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — FANG at a 37.44% CAGR versus KMI at 4.10%.
- Does FANG or KMI pay a bigger dividend?
- FANG yields 2.12% and KMI yields 3.61% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FANG or KMI more profitable?
- KMI runs the higher net margin — FANG at 2.65% versus KMI at 18.92%.
- Which has been the better investment, FANG or KMI?
- Over the past 10-year, FANG delivered the higher annualized total return — FANG at 11.17% versus KMI at 9.38%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Diamondback Energy P/E ratioKinder Morgan P/E ratioDiamondback Energy dividend yieldKinder Morgan dividend yieldDiamondback Energy ROEKinder Morgan ROEDiamondback Energy operating marginKinder Morgan operating marginDiamondback Energy revenue growthKinder Morgan revenue growthDiamondback Energy free cash flowKinder Morgan free cash flow
Diamondback Energy & Kinder Morgan appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.