Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) vs Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR)
A side-by-side comparison of Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Fiverr International Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: FANG is classified in Energy; FVRR is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$204.97EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
$9.03Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — FANG vs FVRR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7yFANG +175.3% (+15.6%/yr)FVRR -77.6% (-19.3%/yr)FANG compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FANG FVRR
FANG vs FVRR: by the numbers
- •FANG is the larger company ($57.66B vs $325M market cap).
- •FVRR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.15 vs 40.03 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •FANG converts more revenue to profit (9.27% vs 7.18% net margin).
- •FANG grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.48% vs 10.69% CAGR).
- •FANG pays a dividend (2.07% yield), while FVRR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FANG | FVRR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.03 | 11.15 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 5.57 |
| P/S ratio | 3.37 | 0.78 |
| P/B ratio | 1.52 | 0.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.99 | 5.50 |
| FCF yield | 11.27% | 28.22% |
Profitability
| Metric | FANG | FVRR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.16% | 82.00% |
| Operating margin | 27.68% | 4.51% |
| Net margin | 9.27% | 7.18% |
| ROE | 4.18% | 6.87% |
| ROIC | 5.88% | 3.76% |
Dividends
| Metric | FANG | FVRR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.07% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 83.01% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FANG | FVRR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 31.48% | 10.69% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 25.44% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 51.55% | 26.82% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 27.63% | -45.19% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, FANG or FVRR?
- FVRR has the lower trailing P/E: FANG trades at 40.03 and FVRR at 11.15. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, FANG or FVRR?
- Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — FANG at a 31.48% CAGR versus FVRR at 10.69%.
- Does FANG or FVRR pay a bigger dividend?
- FANG pays a dividend (2.07% yield), while FVRR has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is FANG or FVRR more profitable?
- FANG runs the higher net margin — FANG at 9.27% versus FVRR at 7.18%.
- How have FANG and FVRR total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, FANG delivered 27.63% and FVRR delivered -45.19% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Diamondback Energy P/E ratioFiverr International P/E ratioDiamondback Energy dividend yieldDiamondback Energy ROEFiverr International ROEDiamondback Energy operating marginFiverr International operating marginDiamondback Energy revenue growthFiverr International revenue growthDiamondback Energy free cash flowFiverr International free cash flow
Diamondback Energy & Fiverr International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.