Factorial Energy Inc. (FAC) vs Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK)
A side-by-side comparison of Factorial Energy Inc. and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
FAC
Factorial Energy Inc.
$5.47IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:39 PM EDT
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
$2.93IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:39 PM EDT
Total return — FAC vs TUSK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yFAC -45.4% (-45.4%/yr)TUSK -0.4% (-0.4%/yr)TUSK compounded faster over this window
FAC TUSK
FAC vs TUSK: by the numbers
- •FAC is the larger company ($151M vs $141M market cap).
- •TUSK is profitable (1.23% net margin) while FAC runs a net loss (0.00%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FAC | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 197.97 |
| P/S ratio | N/A | 2.34 |
| P/B ratio | 1.78 | 0.54 |
Profitability
| Metric | FAC | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 0.00% | -19.33% |
| Operating margin | 0.00% | -63.52% |
| Net margin | 0.00% | 1.23% |
| ROE | -17.64% | 0.28% |
| ROIC | -14.65% | -8.10% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FAC | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -25.88% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -2.17% |
Frequently asked
- Is FAC or TUSK more profitable?
- TUSK runs the higher net margin — FAC at 0.00% versus TUSK at 1.23%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.