Which has the lower trailing P/E, FA or MMS?

MMS has the lower trailing P/E: FA trades at 126.39 and MMS at 8.01. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FA or MMS?

Over the past five years, FA grew revenue faster — FA at a 22.61% CAGR versus MMS at 5.21%.

Does FA or MMS pay a bigger dividend?

MMS pays a dividend (2.37% yield), while FA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is FA or MMS more profitable?

MMS runs the higher net margin — FA at 1.51% versus MMS at 7.07%.

How have FA and MMS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, FA delivered -0.53% and MMS delivered -6.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

First Advantage Corporation (FA) vs Maximus, Inc. (MMS)

A side-by-side comparison of First Advantage Corporation and Maximus, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

First Advantage Corporation

$3.19B

$18.58IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:05 AM EDT

MMS

Maximus, Inc.

$2.85B

$54.20IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:00 AM EDT

Total return — FA vs MMS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

FA +3.6% (+0.7%/yr)MMS -36.2% (-8.6%/yr)FA compounded faster over this window

FA MMS

FA vs MMS: by the numbers

•FA is the larger company ($3.19B vs $2.85B market cap).
•MMS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.01 vs 126.39 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MMS converts more revenue to profit (7.07% vs 1.51% net margin).
•FA grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.61% vs 5.21% CAGR).
•MMS pays a dividend (2.37% yield), while FA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FA	MMS
P/E ratio	126.39	8.01
Forward P/E	N/A	6.48
PEG ratio	N/A	0.78
P/S ratio	1.92	0.54
P/B ratio	2.46	1.64
EV / EBITDA	11.66	6.28
FCF yield	7.53%	15.21%

Profitability

Metric	FA	MMS
Gross margin	36.27%	24.38%
Operating margin	10.76%	10.87%
Net margin	1.51%	7.07%
ROE	1.94%	21.31%
ROIC	3.42%	11.34%

Dividends

Metric	FA	MMS
Dividend yield	N/A	2.37%
Payout ratio	N/A	19.05%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FA	MMS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.61%	5.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	10.34%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	21.23%	4.31%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-0.53%	-6.86%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FA or MMS?: MMS has the lower trailing P/E: FA trades at 126.39 and MMS at 8.01. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FA or MMS?: Over the past five years, FA grew revenue faster — FA at a 22.61% CAGR versus MMS at 5.21%.
Does FA or MMS pay a bigger dividend?: MMS pays a dividend (2.37% yield), while FA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is FA or MMS more profitable?: MMS runs the higher net margin — FA at 1.51% versus MMS at 7.07%.
How have FA and MMS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, FA delivered -0.53% and MMS delivered -6.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FA analysis Full MMS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

First Advantage P/E ratio Maximus P/E ratio Maximus dividend yield First Advantage ROE Maximus ROE First Advantage operating margin Maximus operating margin First Advantage revenue growth Maximus revenue growth First Advantage free cash flow Maximus free cash flow

First Advantage & Maximus appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.