Which has the lower trailing P/E, EYE or MLKN?

MLKN has the lower trailing P/E: EYE trades at 27.35 and MLKN at 14.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EYE or MLKN?

Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with EYE's decline the smaller — EYE at a -0.31% CAGR versus MLKN at -0.67%.

Does EYE or MLKN pay a bigger dividend?

MLKN pays a dividend (3.57% yield), while EYE has no payments in the available dividend history.

How have EYE and MLKN total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, EYE delivered -21.96% and MLKN delivered -8.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

National Vision Holdings, Inc. (EYE) vs MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN)

A side-by-side comparison of National Vision Holdings, Inc. and MillerKnoll, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EYE

National Vision Holdings, Inc.

$1.34B

$16.74Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MLKN

MillerKnoll, Inc.

$1.41B

$20.72Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — EYE vs MLKN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y

EYE -40.6% (-5.6%/yr)MLKN -26.8% (-3.4%/yr)MLKN compounded faster over this window

EYE MLKN

EYE vs MLKN: by the numbers

•MLKN is the larger company ($1.41B vs $1.34B market cap).
•MLKN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.70 vs 27.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•Both shrank revenue over the past five years; EYE's decline was smaller (-0.31% vs -0.67% CAGR).
•MLKN pays a dividend (3.57% yield), while EYE has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EYE	MLKN
P/E ratio	27.35	14.70
Forward P/E	16.60	10.27
P/S ratio	0.66	0.37
P/B ratio	1.50	1.04
EV / EBITDA	11.36	5.26
FCF yield	3.66%	8.18%

Profitability

Metric	EYE	MLKN
Gross margin	55.22%	39.57%
Operating margin	4.13%	5.51%
Net margin	2.47%	2.57%
ROE	5.61%	7.22%
ROIC	3.86%	4.77%

Dividends

Metric	EYE	MLKN
Dividend yield	N/A	3.57%
Payout ratio	N/A	53.19%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EYE	MLKN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-0.31%	-0.67%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.84%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-28.54%	3.42%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-21.96%	-8.42%

Some values include inputs from SEC filing.

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EYE or MLKN?: MLKN has the lower trailing P/E: EYE trades at 27.35 and MLKN at 14.70. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EYE or MLKN?: Neither grew: over the past five years both shrank revenue, with EYE's decline the smaller — EYE at a -0.31% CAGR versus MLKN at -0.67%.
Does EYE or MLKN pay a bigger dividend?: MLKN pays a dividend (3.57% yield), while EYE has no payments in the available dividend history.
How have EYE and MLKN total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, EYE delivered -21.96% and MLKN delivered -8.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EYE analysis Full MLKN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

National Vision P/E ratio MillerKnoll P/E ratio MillerKnoll dividend yield National Vision ROE MillerKnoll ROE National Vision operating margin MillerKnoll operating margin National Vision revenue growth MillerKnoll revenue growth National Vision free cash flow MillerKnoll free cash flow

National Vision & MillerKnoll appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.